The word in Latin for "the movement of different voices against one another" is <em>motet</em>. In Medieval times, the word was <em>motectum, </em>the word was also used to describe the phrase during the Renaissance era.
I can only answer the 1st question.
Both men in these stories faced peer pressure. They were pressured to go against their own beliefs in order to satisfy society's demands.
<span>“No Witchcraft for Sale.” - In this story, Gideon did not bow down to peer pressure. He kept silent and gave the impression of succumbing to the pressure given to him but doing what he wanted to really do. He gave the wrong root to satisfy the demands of the public. He also signified his displeasure by being more formal to his employers and for keeping his silence.
"</span><span>“Shooting an Elephant” - In this story, the police man gave in to the pressure of shooting the elephant not because it is a legal thing to do but because of self-preservation. He doesn't want to appear as a fool to the public that detests him. He preferred to be hailed as the one who shot the elephant than be further jeered as the one who did not shoot the elephant.
Both men did what they did to serve their own purpose. Gideon's way was sticking to his values while the police man sacrificed his own values to ensure an acceptable place in the community he lives in. </span>
Answer:
True
Explanation:
These three features of successful intelligence are interconnected:
- Analytical skills are necessary to figure problems out and evaluate how good ideas are.
- Creative skills are necessary to initially create well-done problems and ideas.
- Practical skills are necessary to implement the ideas effectively and study them during the day.
Answer:
<h3>Camel has three humb</h3>
Explanation:
That is obvious
