What do you mean?
I see no image to elaborate on your question
Answer:
No, death of Mercutio does not seem to be justified.
Death of Mercutio can not be justified because his death was accidental.
Neither Tybalt's death seem to be justified.
Explanation:
Romeo and Juliet is a Romantic Tragedy written by William Shakespeare.
In Act 3, Scene 1, of the play, in a feud between Tybalt and Mercutio, Mercutio was killed accidentally by Tybalt. Tybalt and Mercutio entered the sword fight after Tybalt continues to instigate Romeo for fight and Mercutio, being hot-tempered, challenged Tybalt for the feud. To stop the fight, Romeo enters the feud and in this, Tybalt's sword escapes Romeo's arm and stabs Mercutio to death.
So, this shows that Mercutio does not seem to die and his death can not be justified as his death was an accident.
Death of Tybalt also does not seem to be justified as he was killed in anger by Romeo to avenge the death of his friend, Mercutio. After killing Tybalt, Romeo also seem to realize that he should not have killed Tybalt.
Answer:
I think Odysseus should’ve stayed home instead of ending up in Cyclops Land where all of his boys died.
Explanation:
Answer: from her words on the poem " what high and mighty
hypocrites!
They claim
I’m the foul one!" She sees them as pretenders who act like they have feelings or virtues which they certainly don't have.
She also sees the God and goddess as hard-headed, and too proud to learn but she shows care and concern which the Gods do not posses, from the line "a little care and concern, but the gods are hardheaded;
they never learn."
