Let us dissect each sentence to tell which of these does not follow the rules for subject-verb agreement.
A.) The subject is 'each of the students' while the verb is 'is'. More particularly, the verb refers to 'each' which is singular. So, this is correct.
B.) The subject is 'student' while the verb is 'were'. The word 'were' is the paste tense of are which is used for a plural subject. But since student is singular, then the verb should have been 'was'. So, this is incorrect.
C.) The subject is 'my dog and my cat' which pertains to two nouns, thus it is plural. It agrees with its plural verb 'are'.
D.) The subject is 'Tom' while the verb is 'does'. Both are intended for singular use. So, this is correct.
Therefore, the answer to this is letter B.
George Herbert was a <span>Welsh-born poet from the U.K. His poetry was one of the best around, probably because of the way he used his thoughts to elaborate them. Contexts about understanding Herbert's poetry include what they actually mean. This is important as poetry always has a meaning, and the reader also has to find out what the poem means.
P:S: I am not sure if this is correct, but if it is, give it a like!
I tried my best</span>
A pronoun is a word that takes the place of a noun. For example :
<span>I, me, he, she, herself, you, it, that, they, each, few, many, who, whoever, whose, someone, everybody, etc.
In the sentences above the right answer lies in the option :
</span><span>B. We returned our books to the library.
</span>OUR is the pronoun.
The answer is A) I learned to sew by taking a class, it was taught by a great teacher. The reason is because a comma splice is used to join two independent clauses together. An independent clause is a simple sentence that can stand alone on its own. Because the first part and second part of the sentence can stand alone on their own as two separate sentences they are both independent clauses. Thus A is an example of a comma splice.
The answer would be:
<span>Tubman used logos most effectively. She told the group facts about the risks of returning to the plantation, explaining the risks for all involved. She explained that they would have to choose between freedom and death. She wanted them to know that returning wasn't an option.</span>
