the common method of trading in the distant past is known as marketing
Answer:
a higher price and produce a smaller output than a competitive firm
Explanation:
A monpolistically competitive firm is a firm that :
1. Sells differentiated products from other firms in the industry.
2. Has many buyers and sellers
3. Is a price maker
4. Has no barrier to entry or exist of firms
An example of a monpolistically competitive firm is a resturant.
A competitive firm is a firm that:
1. Sells identical goods with other firms in the industry.
2. Is a price taker . Prices are set by forces of demand and supply
3. Has many buyers and sellers
4. There are no barriers to entry or exist of firms.
When a monopolistic and competition firm are faced with the same unit cost, a monopolistic firm would aim to earn profit by increasing its price and reducing the quantity produced.
While a perfect competition would sell at the price set by the forces of demand and supply. The firm can increase the quantity produced in order to increase revenue.
A monopolistic firm is able to charge a higher price for its products while a perfect competition isn't.
Answer:
$22
Explanation:
Given that,
Acquisition cost of product ALPHA = $24
Net realizable value for product ALPHA = $23
Normal profit for product ALPHA = $1.00
Market value (replacement cost) for product ALPHA = $21
By applying LCM, the per unit inventory value is determined by deducting the normal profit from the Net realizable value for product.
Per unit inventory value:
= Net Realizable Value - Normal Profit
= $23 - $1.00
= $22
Therefore, the proper per unit inventory value for product ALPHA applying LCM is $22.00.
Answer:
b. Market share ratio
Explanation:
When the sizes of firms of a particular sector/market are being compared, a common basis for comparison is on the basis of total sales, a larger firm will have a higher ratio of total sales in the sector.
The "concentration ratio" is derived from the market shares. It gives the sum of market shares of the few largest firms in the sector, and is a measure of market power. It is not the correct choice in this case.
Answer:
The $12 million is the net increase in the denominator of the EPS fraction if the market price of the common shares averages $5 per share during 2018.
Explanation:
1. The journal entry is shown below:
For December 31, 2017:
Compensation Expenses A/c Dr ($18 million × $5 per share) ÷ 3 = $30 million
To Restricted Shares $30 million
(Being compensation expenses recorded for 2017 year)
For December 31, 2018:
Compensation Expenses A/c Dr ($18 million × $5 per share) ÷ 3 = $30 million
To Restricted Shares $30 million
(Being compensation expenses recorded for 2018 year)
2. The net increase in the denominator of the EPS fraction for 2018 year is shown below:
= 2018 shares - Restricted shares
= $30 million - $18 million
= $12 million
Hence, the $12 million is the net increase in the denominator of the EPS fraction if the market price of the common shares averages $5 per share during 2018
