Answer:
a,b,c (this is the order in which the blanks should be filled)
Explanation:
if you do a little bit of research, you can find the answers... it's really just defining terms
hope that was helpful! if it was, please let me know by marking me the brainliest! have a nice day:)
Here's one-With only an elementary school education he began his career as a sewing-machine mechanic
The Integration of Little Rock Central High School refers to the crisis that had occurred during the year 1957, wherein Orval Faubus used national guards to prevent African Americans from attending school at the said high school, because of the racial desegregation during the past.
Answer:
The food that the Pueblo tribe ate included meat obtained by the men who hunted deer, small game and turkeys. As farmers the Pueblo Tribe produced crops of corn, beans, sunflower seeds and squash in terraced fields. Crops and meat were supplemented by nuts, berries and fruit including melons.
so i would say yes
Explanation:
░░░░▐▀█▀▌░░░░▀█▄░░░
░░░░░▐█▄█▌░░░░░░▀█▄░░
░░░░░░▀▄▀░░░▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░
░░░░▄▄▄██▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░
░░░█▀▄▄▄█░▀▀░░
░░░▌░▄▄▄▐▌▀▀▀░░ This is Bob
▄░▐░░░▄▄░█░▀▀ ░░
▀█▌░░░▄░▀█▀░▀ ░░ Copy And Paste Him onto all of ur brainly answers
░░░░░░░▄▄▐▌▄▄░░░ So, He Can Take
░░░░░░░▀███▀█░▄░░ Over brainly
░░░░░░▐▌▀▄▀▄▀▐▄░░
░░░░░░▐▀░░░░░░▐▌░░
░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░█░
Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
