Using what you have learned, write a generalization about government in Latin America.

2 answers:

8 0

Latin America is a region of racial and cultural diversity. <span>It is a group of countries and dependencies in the Americas where Romance languages are predominant. The term originated in 19th century France as Amérique latine to consider French-speaking territories in the Americas along with the larger group of countries where Spanish and Portuguese languages prevailed.</span>

Stella [2.4K]3 years ago

3 0

The answer would be

Latin America is a region of racial and cultural diversity. It is a group of countries and dependencies in the Americas where Romance languages are predominant. The term originated in 19th century France as Amérique latine to consider French-speaking territories in the Americas along with the larger group of countries where Spanish and Portuguese languages prevailed.

You might be interested in

What race issues was Senator Johnson likely referring to in California and in the South? Given who

ser-zykov [4K]

Taking into account the statement above

"What race issues was Senator Johnson likely referring to in California and in the South? Given who supported the Treaty (see Doc C), why might he have made this argument?

The answer is: The Southern regions since they obtained the most percent of the votes in support of president Wilson referring too 90%.

6 0

2 years ago

In the mid-1700s, which industrializing nation was the dominant commercial power in the atlantic ocean?

Lena [83]

England was the dominant commercial power in the Atlantic ocean in the mid-1700s. During this period, the English society contained a flourishing and more broad middling sector than any other western country. This provided a sturdy opportunity for commerce with, and settlement in, far-flung territories.

4 0

3 years ago

how would you define the term "massacre"? How many people have to die in order for an event to be called a "massacre".

SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

Explanation:

Massacre: an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.

“an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of many people” Many is of course “A large quantity”. So there we have it, certainly more than a couple but if it gets to be say 100,000, which is definitely a large number, I suspect that might be encroaching into the realms of genocide.

OK so if you happen upon a car crash and there are bodies spread over the scene, 2 from each of the 2 cars, then you would immediately spot, just by looking there were 4 people involved, but if it was a pair of coaches each with 52 passengers and they were all spread around the scene you wouldn’t be able to put a number to it by just sweeping your eyes across the mess, perhaps then it is getting to be a massacre. Could that be a useful definition? If the number slaughtered is more than you can estimate merely with a look? I also think it needs to be within a definable area, like a football field, or a stadium or perhaps a town. If it involved a whole region of a country then it becomes Genocide, maybe.

Could it be then The indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of more people within a definable area than you can estimate readily with a sweep of your eyes.

Just a suggestion, so go gently on me ………….

6 0

3 years ago

List five challenges the settlers faced at Jamestown?

Elden [556K]

Answer:

They faced Hostile Indians, starvation, poor leadership, lack of government, cannibalism, and lack of skills among colonists. So sorry if this is incorrect.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Texas Revolution is true

yan [13]

Indeed it is sir, can you help with my questions ?

8 0

2 years ago