Answer:
The correct answer are A and E.
Explanation:
Cost leadership is where the company intends to be the lowest cost producer in its industrial sector. The company has a broad picture and serves many segments of the industrial sector, and can still operate in related industrial sectors. The breadth of the company is often important for its cost advantage. The sources of cost advantages are varied and depend on the structure of the industrial sector. They can include the persecution of economies of scale of own technology, preferential access to raw materials.
A successful cost leadership strategy is disseminated throughout the company, as evidenced by high efficiency, low overhead, limited benefits, waste intolerance, thorough review of budget requests, extensive control elements, rewards linked to cost concentration and extensive employee participation in attempts to control costs.
Some risks of following cost leadership is that competitors could mimic the strategy, decreasing the profits of the industry in general; that technological advances in the industry could make the strategy ineffective or that the interest of the buyers could be diverted towards other characteristics of differentiation besides the price.
Answer:
c) There are no guaranteed investments.
Explanation:
Although all statements are mostly true, the c) answer describes the challenge of investing in the simplest way possible.
The guarantee of investments is not discrete, meaning <u>an investment can never be 100% or 0% guaranteed.</u> Investments are always associated with a certain amount of risk, as numerous factors are always influencing its outcome. Therefore, we can differ only high-risk, low-risk and medium-risk investments.
The answer to this question is "10, 000 years innovation". Hence, to complete the sentence we have it "Innovations in the field of agriculture have increased and keep increasing the food supply. This situation has allowed the human populations to grow approximately 10,000 years innovations by the end of the agriculture period".
Answer:
<u>Advantages</u>
Dividends
These are payments to shareholders as a way to share the profits the company has accumulated.
This is an advantage to the issuing company because they are usually not under any obligation to pay Dividends with respect to common Equity. As a result profits can be plowed back into the company to increase profitability.
Repaid
This refers to the fact that shareholders do not have to be repaid for their investment like debt holders are. Stock Holders bought a piece of the company instead of loaning money to the company so they do not have to be paid back. This is an advantage because it frees up Cashflow for the company as well as allowing it to maintain a better credit rating due to lower debts.
Future Buy-Back
This is a clause inherent in most shares. It means that the Issuing company can choose to buy back the stock at a given time in future.
This is an Advantage because it allows the Issuing company to regain control of the company at a future date.
<u>Disadvantages</u>.
Shareholders
Shareholders are people or entities who buy shares in the Issuing company. As such, they are owners in the company and have voting rights on decisions that the company makes. This is a disadvantage because it means loss of Independence for the company who now legally have to take the opinions of shareholders into account.
Net Profit After Tax
This is money that the company has after paying off interests and then taxes. This is the money that the company retains. Having shareholders means that a company may have to pay shareholders from this amount instead of retaining all of it thereby making it at a disadvantage to the Issuing company.
One Vote per Share
This means that every shareholder has a vote for every share they hold in the company. This means that Shareholders therefore have a say in the affairs of the company. This is a disadvantage to the Issuing company because it means a loss of Independence for them when decisions need to be made.
Answer:
d.mitigating
Explanation:
This is a mitigating factor. A mitigating factor is a fact of relevance as it can reveal the motivations of the crime. Although not sufficient to absorb the defendant, except in cases of self-defense, when there is evidence of mitigating factors, this can be used to soften a defendant's penalty if it is proven that the motive for the crime was not misleading. A good example is the case in which the defendant committed a murder, and he was sentenced to death, but there is a mitigating factor: the defendant suffered physical abuse for years and killed his attacker. The jury can understand that the defendant committed the crime due to the suffering caused by the victim, which would be different from a crime motivated by trite motives. Thus, the death penalty can be understood as disproportionate and it can be reversed to a less severe penalty.
