From the memoirs of Otto Lais, a member of the German Infantry Regiment number one hundred and sixty-nine, it is observed that certain comments were made in relation to the Battle of the Somme which lasted between 1914-1916.
- A portion of the excerpt reads as follows:
<em>"Belt after belt was fire, 250 rounds - 1000 - 3000...18,000 rounds!"</em>
- In order to determine what he meant by this statement, it is important to read the protext, the text, and the statement in context.
- Hence the portions immediately before and after the statement relating to the number of bullets read thus:
<em>"The machine gunners were earning their pay today. Belt after belt was fired, 250 rounds - 1,000 - 3,000...The British kept charging forward. Despite the fact that hundreds are already lying dead in the shell holes to our front, fresh waves keep emerging from the assault trenches...18,000 rounds!"</em>
Then there is the last sentence from that excerpt:
"<em>The youth of England bled to death in front of Serre (our position)"</em>
- The report was one of bravery on their part and how they "dealt" with the English Army. Hence, the reference to bullet rounds was used to convey a sense of patriotism (Option D).
- If he meant to convey hatred, the document would have been filled with words describing the British army in such a manner.
See the link below to learn more about the Battle of the Somme:
brainly.com/question/789196
Answer:
relevance is the measure of accuracy of the relationship between the search query and the search results,,, Accuracy is defined as 'the degree to which the result of a measurement conforms to the correct value or a standard' and essentially refers to how close a measurement is to its agreed value
Explanation:
Answer:
The buried trauma of World War I and the residual pain and deprivation that veterans are grappling with six years after the war ends are the key themes of Katherine Mansfield's "The Fly."
Answer: I believe it is c
Explanation: sorry if I'm wrong I tried. have a blessed day and mary Christmas.
Option 2) Logical.
Logical is the Aristotelian persuasive appeal through logic. The main point of logical arguments is whether or not they sustain the conclusion you've stated before them, that is, if your arguments make sense. Examples of strategies for logical arguments are comparisons, cause and effect relations, or simply stating logical facts (which is the case of our example).
<em>Observation: </em>Option 4) Reasonable could be confused as an answer, but since it's not the name of a 'persuasive appeal', I don't believe it's the correct choice.