I believe it is criminal for the fact it is a local law broken and not written within the constitution, its is not civil for the fact no one is injure or civilly offended, and it is not a military or war law that he broke.
The answer is criminal
Answer:
The president serves as the head of the military, has the power to veto legislations, and can ratify new laws once they have assed through parliment
Explanation:
A Historian would most likely analyze a tablet from Ur and its cunieform writing to determine what goods were traded by the merchants of Ur.
The court deemed that the ban violated the first amendment because according to the first amendment people have the right of free speech. Since this law ruled that English was the only language that could be used, it was understood as if the law was against the constitution because it prohibited free speech.
Answer:
I think -to punish Germany for starting the war
- to bring about world government
Explanation:
they wanted Germany severly punished and to cease all actions
