While C and D are both true, C caused them to suffer most greatly.
The answer is <span>a. Henry Clay</span>
In practical presidential politics the outstanding question of the day is whether President Coolidge will be a candidate for renomination and reelection in 1928. The President has given no indication of his own attitude, nor is it likely that any direct announcement of his intention to be or not to be a candidate will be forthcoming until shortly in advance of the Republican National Convention. A premature announcement that he was not a candidate would measurably weaken, if not destroy, the President's influence with the leaders of his party, while an announcement of his candidacy would provide definite basis for the organization, both within and without the party, of opposition to his renomination and reelection.
Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address six weeks ago in which he described himself as “a working Republican who is both a personal friend and a political supporter of President Coolidge,” said he was taking it for granted “that when he thinks the right time has come he will make public statement of his unwillingness to have his name considered in connection with the Republican presidential nomination of 1928.” The President's good common sense, Dr. Butler believed, would dictate against “inviting certain defeat through injecting the third term issue into the campaign.”
As early as July 1926, the late Senator Albert Cummins, following his defeat and the defeat of other administration senators in the senatorial primaries, had expressed the opinion in a widely published statement that the President would not be a candidate in 1928, that he would have “had enough of it by that time.” Neither the Cummins statement, nor the Butler speech seven months later both of which were interpreted as “an effort to smoke out the President” brought any announcement from the White House of the President's attitude toward his renomination.
Answer:
poorly equipped and outnumbered
Explanation:
The author describe the Confederate troops led by General John Bell Hood as poorly equipped and outnumbered
The way that the Iroquois would have been helpful in assisting the British troops in the surprise attack is A.) the Iroquois likely have been better knowledge of the area and could lead British troops through the woods.
<h3>How did the Iroquois help the British?</h3><h3 />
When the French and Indian War broke out, the Iroquois Confederacy sided with the British because they wanted to protect their lands from the French.
The Iroquois had been living in the area for centuries and so knew the layout of the area and how to get around. They could therefore lead the British through short-cuts in the woods to appear behind the French and launch surprise attacks on them.
Options for this question include:
- A.) the Iroquois likely have been better knowledge of the area and could lead British troops through the woods
- B.) the Iroquois had better knowledge of the habits of the French and Algonquins and could plan accordingly
- C.) the Iroquois likely had more modern equipment and the British
- D.) the Iroquois likely instructed British troops had a fight in the woods
Find out more on the Iroquois helping the British at brainly.com/question/14007822
#SPJ1
