1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
n200080 [17]
3 years ago
8

The culture of the plains indians was changed by

History
2 answers:
Serjik [45]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The culture of the Plains Indians changed by the introduction of horses by the Spanish.

Explanation:

One of the mai things that changed the Indians' every day lives were horses. Horses were brought by the Spanish conquerors because these animals were not in America. So when the Spanished conquered territories in the Americas, they started using horses in that territory as they did in Europe. This really benefitted the Indians because they transported things faster and carried more thing than with any other known method by the Indians in the Plains.

notka56 [123]3 years ago
3 0
Juan de Ornate changed the way they hunted
You might be interested in
Can someone pls help with this?? i need it done in an hour
lara31 [8.8K]
While C and D are both true, C caused them to suffer most greatly.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the name of the leader of the War Hawks?
EleoNora [17]
The answer is <span>a. Henry Clay</span>
4 0
4 years ago
What was the origin of the no-third-term tradition
Bogdan [553]

In practical presidential politics the outstanding question of the day is whether President Coolidge will be a candidate for renomination and reelection in 1928. The President has given no indication of his own attitude, nor is it likely that any direct announcement of his intention to be or not to be a candidate will be forthcoming until shortly in advance of the Republican National Convention. A premature announcement that he was not a candidate would measurably weaken, if not destroy, the President's influence with the leaders of his party, while an announcement of his candidacy would provide definite basis for the organization, both within and without the party, of opposition to his renomination and reelection.

Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address six weeks ago in which he described himself as “a working Republican who is both a personal friend and a political supporter of President Coolidge,” said he was taking it for granted “that when he thinks the right time has come he will make public statement of his unwillingness to have his name considered in connection with the Republican presidential nomination of 1928.” The President's good common sense, Dr. Butler believed, would dictate against “inviting certain defeat through injecting the third term issue into the campaign.”

As early as July 1926, the late Senator Albert Cummins, following his defeat and the defeat of other administration senators in the senatorial primaries, had expressed the opinion in a widely published statement that the President would not be a candidate in 1928, that he would have “had enough of it by that time.” Neither the Cummins statement, nor the Butler speech seven months later both of which were interpreted as “an effort to smoke out the President” brought any announcement from the White House of the President's attitude toward his renomination.

4 0
3 years ago
How does the author describe the Confederate troops led by General John Bell Hood?
Blababa [14]

Answer:

poorly equipped and outnumbered

Explanation:

The author describe the Confederate troops led by General John Bell Hood as poorly equipped and outnumbered

3 0
3 years ago
how might the iroquois have been helpful in assisting the british troops in the surprise attack? (read the text on the battle of
Anit [1.1K]

The way that the Iroquois would have been helpful in assisting the British troops in the surprise attack is A.) the Iroquois likely have been better knowledge of the area and could lead British troops through the woods.

<h3>How did the Iroquois help the British?</h3><h3 />

When the French and Indian War broke out, the Iroquois Confederacy sided with the British because they wanted to protect their lands from the French.

The Iroquois had been living in the area for centuries and so knew the layout of the area and how to get around. They could therefore lead the British through short-cuts in the woods to appear behind the French and launch surprise attacks on them.

Options for this question include:

  • A.) the Iroquois likely have been better knowledge of the area and could lead British troops through the woods
  • B.) the Iroquois had better knowledge of the habits of the French and Algonquins and could plan accordingly
  • C.) the Iroquois likely had more modern equipment and the British
  • D.) the Iroquois likely instructed British troops had a fight in the woods

Find out more on the Iroquois helping the British at brainly.com/question/14007822

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In her college years, Hilary Clinton showed herself to be an activist by organizing what event?
    14·1 answer
  • What are the different types of economic theories
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the renaissance begin in Italy /6115662/ad685d1f?utm_source=registration
    9·1 answer
  • How did mercantilist policies create tension between great britian and the colonies?
    14·1 answer
  • A CAUSE of the Hundred Years' War was the __________.
    7·1 answer
  • At the battle of Chancellorsville, the union army was____ the confederacy army
    9·2 answers
  • Help According to international law of Europe in the late 18th century, there were only three ways that Britain could take posse
    15·1 answer
  • What kind of book is this
    10·2 answers
  • Plz Help I will give brainllest if correct
    14·1 answer
  • Is government needed to keep order and ensure freedom? Why or why not?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!