1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
julia-pushkina [17]
3 years ago
5

Who was the fifth president of Israel

History
1 answer:
gogolik [260]3 years ago
3 0
Hi , the fifth president of Israel was Yitzhak Rachamim  Navon ,he ruled between1978 and 1983.
You might be interested in
Select definition of anarchy
FinnZ [79.3K]
1 because an anarchy is when there is chaos and the people take all the power rather than sharing it with the government.
4 0
3 years ago
Help plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!
Oduvanchick [21]

Answer:

a. gold coins

Explanation:

Marco Polo was impressed by the paper money, coal burning and gunpowder in China. But, gold coins are not new to him.

7 0
3 years ago
Which was not a cause of world war 2 in europe?
xxTIMURxx [149]
He was correct, u can mark him brainliest

6 0
3 years ago
What was the turning point of the Battle of Gettysburg?
Mila [183]
I Think The answer is a I hope it helps My friend Message Me if I’m wrong and I’ll change My answer and fix it for you
3 0
3 years ago
why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can someone briefly summarize the trojan war about what happened between the goddess and the golden apple? EMERGENCY!
    11·1 answer
  • Which accurately describes a result of the conflict between England and Spain during the 1500s?
    13·2 answers
  • What document begins with the words "we the people of the United States
    8·2 answers
  • Match each group involved in the Russian Revolution with its description.
    13·2 answers
  • List exzamples of ways in which governments unite nations
    8·2 answers
  • What can the ancient societies of Mesoamerica teach us about society today?
    12·1 answer
  • What did historians call someone who wanted independence?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following motivations was a reason for railroad construction in Oklahoma?
    5·2 answers
  • How were free African American communities able to assist poor African Americans in the mid-19th century?
    5·1 answer
  • U
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!