When capital adequacy line is equal to the savings per worker function then "normal expected returns to investor".
<h3>What is
capital adequacy/requirement ratio?</h3>
The capital adequacy ratio (CAR) gauges a bank's level of capital retention in relation to its level of risk. The CAR of banks must be monitored by national regulators in order to ascertain how well it can withstand an acceptable amount of loss.
The components of capital adequacy are-
- The Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) aims to ensure that banks have an adequate amount of capital to safeguard depositors' funds.
- (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) / Risk-Weighted Assets is the calculation for CAR.
- The BIS's capital standards have tightened up in recent years.
- By reducing the likelihood of bank insolvency, capital adequacy ratios promote the effectiveness and stability of a country's financial system.
- A bank with a high capital adequacy ratio is typically thought to be secure and likely to fulfill its financial obligations.
The principle of capital adequacy are-
- High-quality and loss-absorbing capital are both necessary.
- The Basel III criteria for common stock, along with supplementary tier 1 and tier 2 capital, are applied to establish the quality of capital, with retained earnings being the most important factor.
To know more about the capital requirement, here
brainly.com/question/13676980
#SPJ4
Answer: True
=================================================
Explanation:
The first amendment prohibits congress from making any law to prohibit free speech, so that means the federal government isn't allowed to restrict speech. However, there are exceptions such as speech to cause a riot, insurrection, obscenities on public airwaves, etc. all of which are not allowed.
In contrast, a private company like Twitter has the choice whether or not to allow or ban a certain post. The first amendment of the constitution does not apply to companies such as this one. On one hand, you could argue that such restriction is a bad thing because it limits speech; but you could also argue that if the government forced companies like Twitter to do a certain action, then it restricts their freedom.
For privately owned social media companies, their platform is something they solely own 100%, meaning that the government does not own or control what goes on that platform. So this is another viewpoint as to why the first amendment doesn't apply to these companies.
In a slight bit of confusing terminology, a private company can be publicly owned. This means that the government doesn't control the company, but rather it's traded on the stock market. Those who own stock in the company are part owners of it. You would have to use the phrasing "government owned and government run" to indicate that the government has full control of such a platform.
Explanation:
Jon M. Erlandson is a famous archaeologist in the University of Oregon. He specializes in anthropology and his research interests included maritime archaeology, coastal adaptations, the impacts of the human in the coastal adaptation and peopling of North America.
Jon Erlanson states the theory of the boats that helped spread of the anatomically modern humans to the coastal regions in America. He founded the Daisy Cave, 12500 BP in channel islands which suggested the use of the boats.
According to his coastal migration theory, he suggested that people had traveled down to Canada coast and also to California with some sort of sea craft most likely.
Baseball fans break out into a song called "Wild Thing"
Answer:
6. 14 states
7. The Mississippi river
other questions I answered it later because my battery was low
