1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yulyashka [42]
3 years ago
7

The terms of the document misnamed the Peace Treaty . . . violate the conditions of the Armistice. . . . They do not bring an en

d to militarism, but fasten the system more firmly on the peoples of the Allied countries. . . . The treaty is a capitalist, militarist, and imperialist imposition. . . . It does not give the world peace, but the certainty of other and more calamitous [catastrophic] wars.
–Manchester Guardian,
May 9, 1919

How does this passage reflect the British reaction at the end of World War I?

It claims that Germany has been treated unfairly.
It calls for a harsher punishment for Germany.
It demands recognition for the British role in the war.
It explains that the treaty will effectively prevent future wars.
History
2 answers:
pshichka [43]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It claims that Germany has been mistreated.

Explanation:

Driven by French and British desires to make Germany pay for the job it had played in the most difficult strife the world had at this point seen, Wilson and the other Allied delegates at the harmony gathering had for sure moved away from an unadulterated harmony without success.

The Versailles Treaty was marked on 1919. In the interim, restriction to the bargain and its Article 231, seen as an image of the treachery and cruelty of the entire archive, rotted inside Germany.

Serhud [2]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did late 19 century public schools<br> change
timama [110]
<span>The biggest change was the passing of the Civil Rights act, which led to trouble of segregation and such among the states. Also the idea of making education available to everybody also bloomed during this time.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
The school library decides to remove the swimsuit edition of Sports Illustrated from its shelf because of the revealing
lianna [129]

Answer:

Its the schools right

Explanation:

It's Constitutional The school has a right to want is on the school property.

5 0
2 years ago
Can someone please help me​
pashok25 [27]
The answer is C. 435
8 0
3 years ago
HELPPP !!! ... Why was the battle at New York so import into each side ?
Dvinal [7]

Answer:

It is said to have a significant importance as the city allowed access to the Mississippi River, an important route for both transportation of both troops and civilians and shipping of resources and the above stated

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
I need help I really don’t know
Maurinko [17]

Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.

In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.

In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • President Hoover believed that:
    7·1 answer
  • Congress passed a law in 1973 in response to what it perceived as presidential infringement on its constitutional war power. The
    15·1 answer
  • The civil war halted railroad construction in many states
    15·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of people flocking to the Kansas Nebraska area?
    11·1 answer
  • Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954) illustrate how the same Constitutional issue
    12·2 answers
  • It is believed that Egyptians enslaved talented craftspeople from neighboring civilizations to construct the pyramids.
    6·1 answer
  • Why did radical followers of the ayatollah khomeini ovverun the u.s embassy and take american hostage?
    11·1 answer
  • What did the Chinese people believe in?
    10·2 answers
  • I need help on this urgently
    5·1 answer
  • In the late 1800s, where did most European immigrants live in the United States?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!