1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kobusy [5.1K]
3 years ago
7

What were the weaknesses of the articles of confederation? what event exemplified these weaknesses?

History
2 answers:
ryzh [129]3 years ago
8 0

The major defeat or downfall of the Articles of Confederation was simply considered as the weakness. The federal government under that articles are too weak and incapacitated to enforce, impose, and implement their laws and therefore powerless. The Continental Congress borrowed money to fight the Revolutionary War yet could not repay the debts. Thus, it created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a fragile central government.

coldgirl [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The federal government was too weak to enforce their laws and therefore had no power.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The practice of giving government jobs to friends and political supporters was known as which of the following?
LenKa [72]
In politics and government, a spoils system (also known as a patronage system) is a practice in which a political party, after winning an election, gives government jobs to its supporters, friends (cronyism), and relatives (nepotism) as a reward for working toward victory, and as an incentive to keep working for them.
3 0
3 years ago
Help please! "Who were the early explorers; what countries did they represent and where did they travel to?"
Trava [24]
Pedro cabral portugal nobel man
3 0
3 years ago
Why was the United States ripe for the growth of industry? The South had businesspeople to invest in factories. The U.S. has abu
Sauron [17]

I'm sure that it is the US had abundant natural resources.

8 0
3 years ago
"Detalle la Reconquista" Invasión Inglesa de 1806
WITCHER [35]

Answer:

"Detail the Reconquest" English invasion of 1806

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Is America a land of liberty ? Why?
Alex Ar [27]
NO OTHER country puts as much emphasis on “freedom” as the United States. Patrick Henry demanded “liberty or death”. The national anthem calls America “the land of the free”. Great reformers from Abraham Lincoln to Martin Luther King have urged America to live up to its ideal of “freedom”. When a group of French Americanophiles wanted to flatter the United States, they sent the Statue of Liberty.

And no other country boasts as much about its mission to give freedom to the rest of the world. Woodrow Wilson thought that he had a God-given duty to bring liberty to mankind. George Bush regards his foreign policy as a crusade for freedom—“the right and hope of all humanity”.

But how good is America at living up to its own ideals? A new study by Freedom House tries to answer this question. The fact that Freedom House has devoted so much attention to the United States is significant in its own right. Founded in 1941 by a group of Americans who were worried about the advance of fascism, Freedom House is now the world's leading watchdog of liberty. The fact that “Today's American: How Free?” is such a thorough piece of work makes it doubly significant.

The judicious tone of “How Free?” will undoubtedly disappoint leftists. Freedom House bends over backwards to give the authorities the benefit of the doubt. Other countries have recalibrated the balance between freedom and security in the face of terrorists who want to inflict mass casualties on civilians. America's recent sins, however, are minor compared with those of its past. Newspapers have published highly sensitive information without reprisals. Congress and the courts have repeatedly stepped in to restore a more desirable constitutional balance.

But the verdict on the Bush years is nevertheless sharp. “How Free?” not only details and condemns the administration's familiar sins, from Guantánamo to extraordinary rendition to warrantless wiretapping. It reminds readers of its aversion to open government. The number of documents classified as secret has jumped from 8.7m in 2001 to 14.2m in 2005—a 60% increase over three years. Decade-old information has been reclassified. Researchers report that it is much more difficult and time-consuming to obtain information under the Freedom of Information Act.

Government whistleblowers have repeatedly been punished or fired—even when they have been trying to expose threats to national security that their bosses preferred to overlook. Richard Levernier had his security clearance revoked for revealing that some of the country's nuclear facilities were not properly secured. Border security agents have been punished for pointing out that the border is inadequately monitored, and airport baggage-handlers and security people for pointing to weaknesses in the security system. The Office of Special Counsel, which was established to enforce laws designed to protect the rights of such people, is widely regarded as “inept and even hostile to whistleblowers”.

“How Free?” also has some hard things to say about America's criminal-justice system. The incarceration rate exploded from 1.39 per 1,000 in 1980 to 7.5 in 2006, driven, among other things, by the war on drugs. America now has one of the highest rates of imprisonment in the world: 5.6m Americans, or one in every 37 adults, has spent time behind bars. Even though prison-building is one of the country's great growth industries, overcrowding is endemic, with federal prisons operating at 131% of capacity. America is also one of the few countries to ban felons and, in some states, ex-felons from voting. At any one time 4m Americans—one in every 50 adults—is disenfranchised because of past criminal convictions. This includes 1.4m blacks, or 14% of the black male population.

Freedom House's strictures are, if anything, too soft. America insists on criminalising victimless crimes such as prostitution. Last week Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the so-called DC Madam, committed suicide; the government had thrown the book at her, including racketeering and mail fraud, because it really wished to penalise the arranging of assignations between consenting adults. In her suicide note to her mother she wrote that she could not “live the next six-to-eight years behind bars for what you and I have both come to regard as this 'modern-day lynching'.”

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were native apples (crabapples) used for in the 1700s and 1800s? Why?
    8·1 answer
  • With his assembly lines, Henry Ford improved what process?
    6·1 answer
  • The U.S. was mostly moved to break its neutrality because of the attacks on which of its allies?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the first quartile, Q1, of the data represented by the box plot?
    11·2 answers
  • Help!! Any explanation helps :) I’m not too sure about this question
    7·2 answers
  • How did going into debt to win the war impact the American colonies and the French
    9·1 answer
  • How many Soviet citizens died as a result of WWII?
    11·1 answer
  • Which occurred in the United States in the decades after World War II?
    8·1 answer
  • Read the following information to answer the question below. The
    6·1 answer
  • Which president decided to run again AFTER
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!