Answer:
<u>a) Competent parties</u>
Explanation:
This is not an essential element of such a contract because basically we would not expect a minor to be involved in a transaction of a four-family residential resale property.
Remember, competent parties contract requirements are that the two parties in the sale contract should be persons legally and mentally capable of entering into contracts that is enforceable by law.
Answer:
I'm sorry dude I literally have no idea.
Explanation:
Answer:
immediately challenge the rule by filing a complaint with the administrative agency.
Explanation:
Since the new rule is affecting it's business by increasing cost andaking paperwork cumbersome, Al's Car Shack can file a complaint with the administrative agency stating it's case.
There is no dispute yet so there is no need to challenge the rule in court at this time.
If the administrative agency cannot settle with Al's Car Shack the case may go to court.
The investor will show a capital loss of $155.
We gather the following information from this question:
Pop of the fund three years ago : $12
NAV of the fund three years ago : $11.50
Current Pop : $11
Current NAV : $10.45
Number of shares : 100 shares.
We need to calculate capital loss or gain on the 100 shares in the mutual fund.
While taking the cost per unit, <u>we need to consider the public-offer-price (pop) into consideration, since an investor can only buy the shares at pop</u>.
Similarly, while selling the shares, the <u>shareholder can liquidate his position by selling back to the mutual fund at the NAV prevailing at the end of the business day</u> on which he wants to sell.
So, the formula to calculate capital gain or loss is:
