Answer:
It ethier the forst or second Im so sorry if im wrong!
Answer:
Decrease, decrease
Explanation:
A writer of a call option will want the value of the underlying asset to <u>decrease</u> and a buyer of a put option will want the value of the underlying asset to <u>decrease</u>. The writer of the call option who is also the seller of the put option will want the value of the underlying asset which is the financial assets upon which a derivative's price is based to decrease so as to make more profit while the buyer also wants it to decrease so he/she can pay less for the asset.
Answer:She must give them a reasonable amount of work that challenges students without making them feel overwhelmed by the quantity of the work that they have to do.
Explanation:
Student will sometimes feel overwhelmed when they have a lot of work to study and because of this they feel like they will never finish and the only short cut for them is to consider cheating as the way out.
However if she can give them less amount of work this will make them feel at ease and maybe trust in their own capabilities to finish that amount of work .
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
The author means by the phrase that People were able to choose who would lead their governments.
Explanation:
In the 20th century there were a lot of new nations that were formed out of old imperialistic colonies and most of them adopted, or ended up adopting a democratic system of governance where the people have the right to choose who would govern over them and the positions are rotating.
This is something that could be called to have given greater ability for the people to govern their own lives and the author has teemed the century thus as the century where the [power went to the people.
