Answer:
A cartographer is a specialist who makes maps. They have the skills to help navigators explore uncharted territories and they help imperial powers to maintain control and to lay claim to an area like the New World
Explanation:
A cartographer is a specialist at designing and drawing maps. Cartographers still exist today and they use modern technologies to help them produce very accurate and detailed maps, but cartographers were especially important during the times before aerial photographs and satellite photos because they were skilled at understanding topography and the particular details along coastlines and rivers to help explorers navigate new areas. Cartography was essential in the creation of the early maps of the Americas. The Spanish and explorers from other European nations would use the knowledge of the local people to help fill out their maps and to chart the unknown, but over time the maps evolved and gained more of their own interpretations and claims to the landscape. This was how the Spanish Crown was able to claim a monopoly over vast stretches of the Americas for centuries.
Answer:
Wind speed
Explanation:
Climatology is the study of the climate or average weather condition over a period of time. The main parameters involved in this study are temperature, rainfall(precipitation) and wind.
This means wind is the missing parameter in the question hence it’s the answer
The answer is <span> a slower metabolic rate.
Metabolic rate determine how much you burn your food into energy. If a person has a high metabolic rate, the burning process happens so fast which make that person more explosive and hard to gained weight.
Slower metabolic rate means that a large portion of that food will be stored as fat for future use, which make that person hard to lose weight.</span>
Answer:
inconsistency
Explanation:
In argument or logic, inconsistency often referred as internal contradiction or logical inconsistency is a term of a fallacious argument, whereby two or more propositions are asserted that cannot both possibly be true.
Hence, in this case, being described as voluble, verbose, long winded and loquacious is contradictory to being described as an individual who has never utter more than twelve words sentence before.
Therefore the argument is rather considered as Inconsistency
