how did the french and british differ in the tactics they used to control their empires in asia? A) the french offered native pe
ople new technologies, while the british did not. B) the british ruled directly over their colonies, while the french did not. C) the french used violence to control their colonies, while the british did not. D) the british forced their colonies to export goods, while the french did not
Option B, The British governed directly over their colonies, but the French did not.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The French were directly controlled. Officers and soldiers were sent to administer the colony from France. The goal was to force culture on indigenous people. The British depend on indirect control, but on the other side. Local leaders used to govern the colonies.
Throughout North America, the British founded 13 permanent colonies. On the other side, the French had a little permanent solution. Citizens could own property in the British colonies. Only the nobles may own property in the French colonies.
Settlers in North America found it more appealing to the Americans. Property of property was permitted Religious freedom occurred in some colonies. There was a mistake. The British colonies grew faster and have been more productive than the Dutch and French territories.
Due to changes in the economic structure of American life in the 1800s, cultural and social changes where different depending on a lot of stuff Heritage or you’re social class and so on.
