All categories

3 years ago

Without stratospheric ozone, which of the following would most likely occur?

Advanced Placement (AP)

1 answer:

seraphim [82]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

III only

Explanation:

The ozone layer is extremely important for the living organisms on Earth. It is a layer that manages to stop big portion of the UV radiation from reaching the surface of the Earth, thus minimizing its negative effects, and only letting enough of it to be useful for the living organisms. If the ozone layer is removed though, then the UV radiation will be so high that most of the living organisms on land would die out because they can not stand such high levels of UV radiation. The marine organisms will also be badly effected, and the majority of them will also die out because of too much radiation, thus making enormous damage to the life on the planet.

You might be interested in

What is measurements?

Tatiana [17]

Measurement is the assignment of a number to a characteristic of an object or event, which can be compared with other objects or events.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The average salary of someone will be significantly higher the greater

Inga [223]

True but I’m not sure

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What makes children’s eyewitness testimonies so unreliable

antoniya [11.8K]

Stress and trauma. There are many reason why children eyewitness testimonies may not be completely accurate, one of which could be stress and trauma. When children experience a traumatic and stressful event, their ability to accurately recall the event becomes impaired.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What impact does maturation have on the process of development

Marta_Voda [28]

Answer:

Maturation is the development of the individual through growth processes. It is controlled by internal biological factors. ... A child's learning to walk may be attributed to maturation because the child learns to walk when reaching a particular stage in development.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

A. Using information in the graph shown, compare the data trend from 1960 to 2015 for sub-Saharan Africa to the trend shown for

expeople1 [14]

Answer:

A. From the information given in the graph, we have;

The grain yield in pounds per acre for Europe in 1960 is approximately 1,600 Pounds per Acre

The grain yield in pounds per acre for Europe in 2015 is approximately 5,100 Pounds per Acre

The rate of change of grain yield in Europe ≈ (5,100 - 1,600)/(2015 - 1960) = 63. $\overline{63}$ Pounds per Acre per year

The grain yield in pounds per acre for Sub-Saharan Africa in 1960 is approximately 800 Pounds per Acre

The grain yield in pounds per for Sub-Saharan Africa 2015 is approximately 1,250 Pounds per Acre

The rate of change in grain yield in Sub-Saharan Africa ≈ (1,250 - 800)/(2015 - 1960) = 8. $\overline{18}$ Pounds per Acre per year

Therefore, the grain yield per acre per year in Europe is increasing approximately 8 times the increase in Sub-Saharan Africa

B. Given that the rate of increase in the pounds of grain per Acre per year in Europe is progressively increasing above the average rate of world rate, the market for the grains produced in Europe will be partly the developing countries, thereby reducing the number of farms found in developing countries

C. In stage 4 demographic transition the population growth is stabilizing and therefore where there is an increase in grain yields, there will be an increase in farming and economic activity and a reduction in population growth

Where there is a decrease in grain yield, there will be an increase in activities to restore supply and therefore, a reduction in population

D. One limitation of the data in describing food security at a regional scale is the information required on the population figures in a given region involved in grain farming

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago