Schaffer mistakenly told his assistant to strike alarm Box 342, and as a result, firefighters were directed to an incorrect location during the Chicago fire of 1871.
This is the best example of adding concrete details. It specifically says which alarm box Schaffer told his assistant. The original sentence makes it seem as the miscommunication was the big problem. While it was a problem, the fact that the firefighters went to the incorrect location is really the reason the Chicago fire of 1871 was so devastating. Including these details makes the writing much clearer and easier for the reader to follow.
Some figures of speech in this extract from 'The Hunting of Shumba' by Kingsley Fairbridge are:
- Imagery
- Personification
- Assonance
- Consonance
<h3>What are figures of speech?</h3>
Figures of speech are words and phrases that are used to improve the meaning of a text. In the poem above, there were many uses of figures of speech. For instance, assonance was used by the repetition of the vowel e sound.
Consonance was also used when the s sound was used repeatedly in the lines. A personification is a form of speech that is used when things that are not humans are said to display the attributes of humans. For example, the crickets and frogs were said to be singing.
"The hot smell of blood" is a figure of speech that indicates imagery. The senses of perception and feeling were hereby implored. So, these are some examples of the uses of figures of speech in the poem.
Learn more about figures of speech here:
brainly.com/question/1507465
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. when you want a longer quotation from the text to support an argument in your essay
Explanation:
A block quote is usually a larger quote that contains around 4 or more lines. It is used to directly quote larger sections of text to support an argument. It is not used for quotes of small phrases or to paraphrase, so A and C are wrong.
Answer: A
Explanation: While I'm not bilingual, and can't verify if that statement is correct, I do know it's the only "reason" on the list. B is a subjective experience and doesn't really prove anything, C is just different examples of languages and isn't a reason at all, and D is an example of something that could be done to support the claim, but not a reason why the claim is correct. A is the only one that really argues <em>why </em>all students should be required to learn a second language.
um.. I think you should really just try your best with your paragraph
