Hi. Although you submitted a text, you did not submit any questions related to it. This prevents me from giving you any answers. However, when searching for your text on the internet, I was able to find it in a question that asked for the central idea of this text to be explained. If that's the case with your question, I hope the answer below can help you. If this is not the case with your question, the explanation below will make you better understand the text above, which will make your search for answers easier.
The main idea of a text is the message that the author expects you to understand after reading. After reading the text above, we can see that the main idea is the idea of how participation in a jury should be understood as something important and essential in our lives as citizens. This is because, according to the interpretation of the text, the author shows that the participation of a jury gives an example to children and young people, about how this participation is important and it is a social duty that allows the exercise of justice in the country. This is a duty to the country, society and citizens. Thus, when a citizen refuses the call to participate in a jury, he erases all the importance that this act means for everyone's life and acts as if the jury were something trivial, setting a bad example for the next generations.
A compilation of 63 poetry in English by Alfred Housman is known as <u>A Shropshire Lad.</u> It revolves around the passions of youth and the loss of purity.
1. The prominent theme of the poem is:
Option C.) How one should attain wisdom.
The wise man in the lyric tells about love, lover and the consequences of love from the heart.
The poem reflects that one should attain wisdom and listen to discerning advice from wise someone.
2. In the end, poet:
Option B.) Agrees with
The poet first disagrees with the old man but later in his old age, he agrees with the wisdom of the old man.
Thus, one should attain wisdom and listen to wise sayings.
To learn more about A Shropshire Lad follow the link:
brainly.com/question/599164
Answer:
Explanation:
God does not condone this in any way, and this is well established in his word; the bible.
A. Three accounts recorded in the bible are:
i. The assault of Dinah by Scechem the son of Hamor (Genesis 34)
ii. The assault of Uriah's wife by David (2 Samuel 11)
iii. The assault of Tarmar by her step brother, Amnon (1 samuel 13)
B. The consequences of each accounts respectively are:
i. Levi and Simeon (Dinah's brothers) killed the perpetrator and his men.
ii. David killed Uriah, the husband of the woman.
iii. Amnon hated his step sister, Tarmar after the act.
C. In the Old testament, the bible equates sexual assault to murder and gave a divine verdict of death.
Answer:
1. The novel, "Oliver Twist" was written by Charles Dickens.
2. Uncle Franks' garden contained onions, eggplants, and zucchini last year.
3. "I don't have anything to put in the yard," Charlotte complained to John.
