Answer:
The Three-Fifths Compromise seemed to guarantee that the South would be strongly represented in the House of Representatives and would have disproportionate power in electing Presidents.
Southern states had wanted representation apportioned by population
Explanation:
Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.
The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.
Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.
Answer:
They had a matrilineal kinship system.
Explanation:
The Natchez people are one of the many tribes considered to be native Americans.
Aside from the fact that Natchez people speak different native languages that are yet to be associated with other native Americans, they are also known for having a unique social system of nobility classes and exogamous marriage practices.
The Natchez people is a highly based matrilineal kinship society, with adequacy in reckoning along female lines.
