<span>Job 1 is a better choice because the annual income after housing is $65,800 but that of job 2 is $64,700.</span>
Answer:
no, since other things are not held constant, including her income
Explanation:
The law of demand states that price has an inverse relationship with quantity demanded of a good. As price increases the demand reduces, and as price decreases quantity demanded increases.
However this is true when all other factors reman constant.
In the given scenario the price of hamburger has fallen but Hilary buys less of it. This looks like a violation of the law of demand, but her income has changed so the law of demand may not hold here.
All factors do not remain constant.
Hilary's behaviour can be explained by the concept income effect. Where an increase in income leads to the consumer buying more of expensive goods than cheaper ones.
Going beyond the minimum requirements set by the Food and Drug Administration; they have personal responsibility for ethical behavior.This is most closely relates to the business ethics programs.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Business ethics is said to be art and science which helps in maintaining a harmonious relationship with the society and the business conduct of social responsibility.
- These business ideas generally emphasize general business ideas to business behavior.
- It is applicable to all business conduct and to the entire organization along with the individual's conduct.
Answer:
a. Concentric diversification
Explanation:
The concentric diversification is a diversification in which a company purchased or developed its new products that are closely related to that product in which the company is dealing in order to enter one or more markets
Here in the given situation, since the company produced that product that are same to their current markets so that they could enter into a new customer group so this represents the concentric diversification