1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yarga [219]
3 years ago
5

In what way is the area that makes up the country of Germany different now than it was in 1648?

History
2 answers:
Softa [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:   The correct answer is :  The difference is that in 1648 Germany was part of the Lithuanian Polish community. This community was one of the largest and most powerful kingdoms in Europe. In 1648 Germany was divided into several small kingdoms. Germany was a group of small kingdoms, ducats and principalities.

larisa [96]3 years ago
3 0
The one that is different between the area of Germany between now and when it was in 1648 was : in 1648, it was part of the Polish Lithuanian commonwealthBack then, the commonwealth was considered as one of the largest and the most powerful kingdom in Europe
hope this helps:)
You might be interested in
Local culture, subculture, and __________ culture are all types of __________ found around the world. A. universal . . . lifesty
Nutka1998 [239]
C, Individual and Religions. Sorry if I'm sorry. Have a good day
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
More than anything else, what did most American settlers want from American Indians?
damaskus [11]

Answer:

They wanted land and fur.

Explanation:

The fur is to trade and the land is to expand so they ( the british) can claim and take.

6 0
3 years ago
Spain gained control of Louislana as a result of which event?
Airida [17]

Answer:

the answer is B) the French and Indian War

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
In your own words describe what an executive order is and why a president would write one
Lesechka [4]
And executive order if you think that the president signed in order to pass a law
6 0
3 years ago
According to the two migration theories, how might people have settled the Americas?
Zina [86]

Answer:

From 1932 to the 1990s, it was thought the first human migration to the Americas actually took place around 13,500 years ago, based on spear points discovered near Clovis, New Mexico. You may have heard of this referred to as the "Clovis-First Model." Over the last 20 years however, the discourse surrounding the story of the first Americans has come into a new light -- one that challenges the previously accepted theories and replaces them with even more shocking and exciting ones.

With these new ideas, the question regarding the story of the first Americans needed to be asked again: if those proverbial first Americans didn't populate the continent over the Bering Land Bridge, who were they, where did they come from and when, and how did they get here? It began in 1997 with the discovery of an archaeological site in Monte Verde, Chile, dating back to 14,500 years ago - a full millennium older than what was previously thought to be the first people in the new world, and indicating they settled much further south than expected.

Although there was strong debate regarding the dating of the Monte Verde findings, it brought up an interesting question: if humans settled in the Americas so much earlier than previously thought and traveled as far as South America, is it possible that these humans journeyed to the new world through a different route?

One radical theory claims it is possible that the first Americans didn't cross the Bering Land Bridge at all and didn't travel by foot, but rather by boat across the Atlantic Ocean. Though the evidence for this theory is minimal, proponents argue that the artifacts were developed by an earlier and still more ancient European group, known as the Solutrean culture. This style bears an uncanny resemblance to that of the Clovis tools found in the United States, which could suggest that humans may have entered America from the east over a route that has been dubbed the Atlantic Maritime route.

A somewhat more widely accepted maritime theory looks to modern cultural anthropology and linguistics, claiming a striking resemblance between the cultures of Australia, Southeast Asia, and South America. Support for this idea is found partially in the discovery of a 9,500 year old skeleton in Washington State. Dubbed the "Kennewick Man," the skeleton bears a strong physical resemblance to the Japanese Ainu people, suggesting that a pan-Pacific journey via boat might have brought the first Americans to our shores.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What ideas for government did Thomas Jefferson stress in his inaugural address?
    15·1 answer
  • What Emperor built the Landmark Church of Hagia Sophia in Constantinople
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement about democratic governments is true?
    13·2 answers
  • Why did the anti-federalists finally agree to the ratification of the constitution?
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the public fear early unions ?
    11·2 answers
  • The federal reserve system was created to
    6·2 answers
  • Why did Lincoln say, "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states wher
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following do tomatoes and love not have in common? a. association with the color red c. Japanese culture b. growth
    14·2 answers
  • 1.) Which two of the United States’ interventions in other nations would you say were the MOST successful? Why?
    12·1 answer
  • SUPER EASY FUN POINTS TO GET!
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!