Answer:
Scott was considered as property that could not be taken from its owner.
Explanation:
In the way this ruling was written, Dred Scott didn't have the right to sue in a Missouri's courts, since he wasn't considered a citizen.
Section C also basically states the the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and was considered void, as it deprived a US citizen of their property, which is what slaves were considered as at the time.
Answer: Plato users the correct answer is A,C and E.
Explanation: I used the other person's answers of A, B, and D and B and D were wrong
Greek architecture is often D. symmetrical and balanced.
Answer:
To affirm something is to give it a big "YES" or to confirm that it is true.
Explanation:
The verb affirm means to answer positively, but it has a more weighty meaning in legal circles. People are asked to swear an oath or affirm that they will tell the truth in a court of law.