1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lilit [14]
2 years ago
6

How did George Washington respond to the Whiskey Rebellion?

History
1 answer:
skelet666 [1.2K]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

c

Explanation:

i hope this can help you.

You might be interested in
What happened that led to Europe becoming many kingdoms instead of one large Empire? PLS ANSWER :( Im SO lost
Mila [183]

Answer:

A large part of Europe was once part of the same large Empire: the Roman Empire, which ruled the totality of Mediterranean Europe, plus what is today France, the Low Countries, Switzerland, England, Wales, and a few areas of what is today Germany and Austria.

The Western Roman Empire fell, and the regions that it previously ruled were left in a power vacuum. New peoples, particularly germanic tribes, began to settle the previously Roman areas. With time, each of these groups formed new political entities, that developed accross time into the European countries we now today.

For example, the Franks settled in and around Paris, and from this settlement, a large Empire was formed a few centuries later: the Caroligian Empire, founded by Charlemagne. However, the Empire did not survive for long after Charlemange's death, and was divided into three parts: East Francia, Middle Francia, and West Francia.

Middle Francia would quickly disappear, because it was too politically unstable. East Francia on the other hand, would become the Holy Roman Empire, and West Francia would become the Kingdom of France.

From this example, we can see how the European territory evolved from being ruled by a single Empire, to being ruled by a myriad of states.

8 0
3 years ago
Plssss hurryyyy 15 ptssss
madam [21]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Thomas Paine's pamphlet Common Sense convince reluctant Americans to abandon the goal of reconciliation with Britain and
yarga [219]

Answer:

By January 1776, the American colonies were in open rebellion against Britain. Their  soldiers had captured Fort Ticonderoga, besieged Boston, fortified New York City, and  invaded Canada. Yet few dared voice what most knew was true — they were no longer  fighting for their rights as British subjects. They weren’t fighting for self-defense, or  protection of their property, or to force Britain to the negotiating table. They were  fighting for independence. It took a hard jolt to move Americans from professed  loyalty to declared rebellion, and it came in large part from Thomas Paine’s Common  Sense. Not a dumbed-down rant for the masses, as often described, Common Sense is  a masterful piece of argument and rhetoric that proved the power of words.  Thomas Paine was a firebrand, and his most influential essay — Common Sense —  was a fevered no-holds-barred call for independence. He is credited with turning the  tide of public opinion at a crucial juncture, convincing many Americans that war for  independence was the only option to take, and they had to take it now, or else.Thomas  Paine’s Common Sense appeared as a pamphlet for sale in Philadelphia on January 10,  1776, and, as we say today, it went viral. The first printing sold out in two weeks and  over 150,000 copies were sold throughout America and Europe. It is estimated that one  fifth of Americans read the pamphlet or heard it read aloud in public. General  Washington ordered it read to his troops. Within weeks, it seemed, reconciliation with  Britain had gone from an honorable goal to a cowardly betrayal, while independence  became the rallying cry of united Patriots

Explanation: :)

6 0
3 years ago
Which one of these people was NOT a Federalist?
Lorico [155]
It would be "Patrick Henry" who was not a Federalists, since Patrick Henry was in fact opposed to the ratification of the Constitution, which made him an "Anti-Federalist".
3 0
3 years ago
Why is history so important to study?
valina [46]
You can learn about the past and how you can improve on what happened in the past so it won't happen in the future
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to the evolutionary theory the state begins as a
    11·2 answers
  • A historian's interpretation of a subject should
    11·2 answers
  • How do scientists distinguish between an element and a compound?list two elements and two compounds
    15·1 answer
  • How would the Stamp Act be an example of "Taxation without representation"?
    15·2 answers
  • Who is the leader of a party's national committee?
    12·2 answers
  • What was women’s suffrage? a)fighting for women to own land b)fighting for women to receive child support c)fighting for women’s
    13·2 answers
  • 1. What do we call the first ten amendments to the Constitution?
    6·2 answers
  • Somebody please help !! ( history ) !!
    9·1 answer
  • Compare the way empires in Central Asia in the period 1200-1450 treated conquered peoples to another historical empire.
    13·1 answer
  • GOOD AFTERNOON ALL<br>. <br>. <br>. <br>​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!