Answer:
Birth control and abortion Roe v. Wade it does reflect the spirit of the constitution. It reflects because it protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction. And this shows how individual rights come into play when talking about landmark decisions. The second is discrimination against race. Race is one of the biggest things in today's society and when talking about this topic its a hard decision. First it goes together with the constitution for many reasons individual rights. And during this meeting of Dred Scott v. Sanford they discussed Black African Americans rights to become a citizen which means the rights of the Constitution were not even considered.
Explanation:
Risky behavior can lead to:
- decrease in self-esteem given all the aspects of risky behavior that a person may engage in. eg. drugs
-- emotional distress> use this definition to guide you to our answer : emotional distress - Legal Definition. n. A negative emotional reaction—which may include fear, anger, anxiety, and suffering—endured/experienced by the victim of a tort, for which monetary damages may be awarded.
- Internal anger :risky behaviour may lead to a build up of internal anger as in gives the persin engaging in this behaviour a sense of adrenaline and in some way may be emotionally addictive. If a person continues to engage in risky behaviour their violent instincts could become unleashed without them even realising it causing them to have a build up of anger within which in turn can most definitely effect their lifestyle choices.
- decrease in self esteem
- an addiction to it so when life is normal they'll feel grumpier, sad, angst, ect.
- loneliness
- apathy
I think the anser is C that what i think
I know that using fake identification to vote is not the only form of voter fraud.
1, 4, 5, and 6 are all forms of electoral fraud.
Assuming that the groups you have to choose from are:
- A. Believers in a strong national government
- B. Advocates for states' rights
- C. Supporters of abolition
- D. Proponents of western expansion
Believers in a strong national government (A) were most likely to oppose the <em>Marbury v. Madison</em> decision.
This famous 1803 Supreme Court case opposed William Marbury, backed by ex-President John Adams, and James Madison, backed by President Thomas Jefferson.
Adams was a Federalist, a believer in a centralized, national government.
Jefferson was a Democratic-Republican, a defender of states' rights (B), western expansion (D), and the abolition of slavery (C).
<em>Marbury v. Madison</em> was won by the Democratic-Republicans, because the Supreme Court ruled that Madison had a right to prevent Marbury from getting the job he wanted as a justice of the peace commissioned by the former president.
