Natural resources were utilized by American Indians in all facets of their lives.
Natural resources were utilized by American Indians in many facets of life. They dressed in deerskin, which is animal skin. They constructed a shelter out of the materials nearby.
Native Americans used to hunt, farm, and fish. They farmed, hunted, and fished using natural resources including rock, thread, bark, and oyster shell.
The seasons determined the types of food that Native Americans ate, what they wore, and what kind of shelters they possessed. The seasons affected their food choices.
They hunted birds and other animals in the winter and subsisted on the food they had saved from the previous fall. They went hunting, fishing, and picking berries in the spring.
To learn more about American Indians refer to:
brainly.com/question/2600449
#SPJ4
Farmers, fishermen, and hunters were the only three jobs that Aztec boys could expire to after receiving an education.
<h3>
Who were Aztec boys?</h3>
- Girls were taught to weave, while boys were assigned to carry firewood, highlighting the gender inequalities once again.
- Other responsibilities were anticipated as the child grew older.
- Boys began to fish between the ages of seven and ten, but girls were expected to continue to cook and spin for the family.
- Children's Aztec education, on the other hand, began at home with their parents.
- Boys learned and worked alongside their dads at a trade or craft, farming, hunting, and fishing, from the age of four or five.
- All of the tasks required to operate a household were taught to girls by their moms.
- Farmers, fishermen, and hunters were the only three jobs accessible to Aztec boys once they completed their education.
As the description says, farmers, fishermen, and hunters were the only three jobs accessible to Aztec boys once they completed their education.
Therefore, farmers, fishermen, and hunters were the only three jobs that Aztec boys could expire to after receiving an education.
Know more about Aztec boys here:
brainly.com/question/615617
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer choices for the question: On which did the Roman Catholic Church and the Greek Orthodox Church disagree, would be: Interpretation of the Gospels, Papal supremacy (as the main feature) and icons.
Explanation:
The division of the Eastern and Western Catholic Church into what is today known as the Greek Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church took place around 1054, with a schism whose origins were caused by a difference of opinion as to who should be the leader of the Church, to the differences on how to interpret not just the Gospels, but also, on different doctrines. Maybe the two major reasons why these two separated were one, that the Roman Catholic Church upheld certain doctrines that the Orthodox did not agree with, like the doctrine on the Virgin Mary and the Holy Trinity, and also the supremacy of the Pope. The Roman Catholics uphold that the Pope is the supreme head of the Church as established by Christ, while the Orthodox believe in a conciliary model. Icons were also a dividing point as it is generally viewed that Catholics idolize icons and most other Christians, including Orthodox, believe this is idolatry and therefore unacceptable.
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
This ineffective system is especially problematic because most whistleblowers have noble intentions. Michael Horowitz, the IG for the Department of Justice, recently stated that 80 percent of whistleblowers are motivated to improve the system, not tear it down. He cautioned that because normal whistleblower protections do not shield government employees who run straight to the media, those who do so may go for broke, taking as much information as possible. This is a particularly serious problem when the whistleblower has access to classified information.
A few policy changes could remedy this state of affairs and make whistleblowers feel more welcome inside the classified system.
First, the intelligence committees should create a classified, secure intake system for whistleblowers to reach Congress directly and confidentially with their concerns.
Second, Congress should release annual unclassified reports of what it has done with whistleblower complaints. Obviously, the topic of many of these complaints would be incredibly sensitive, so the committees would be able to include only the total number of complaints, the number the committee found merited further action, and perhaps the number of retaliation complaints that the committee received. Releasing these unclassified reports would create a feedback loop so that employees would know that Congress is an effective and secure avenue.
Finally, because the intelligence committees’ staff resources are limited, Congress should turn to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) for additional auditing help. The GAO sets the highest standard for auditing and is frequently used to review complicated and sensitive military intelligence programs for the armed services committees. It could do so for some intelligence committee cases as well.
