Main Answer:The airy settlement that we explored had been built by the Anasazi, a civilization that arose as early as 1500 B.C. Their descendants are today's Pueblo Indians, such as the Hopi and the Zuni, who live in 20 communities along the Rio Grande, in New Mexico, and in northern Arizona.
Side Answers:
Which tribes of today are the descendants of the Anasazi?
The descendants of the Anasazi are still around today, though. The Pueblo and the Hopi are two Indian tribes that are thought to be descendants of the Anasazi. The term Pueblo refers to a group of Native Americans who descended from cliff-dwelling people long ago.
Who were the Anasazi and where did they live?
The Anasazi lived in the four-corners region of North America. They had three major centralized populations in three different places: Chaco Canyon (New Mexico), Mesa Verde (Colorado), and Kayenta (Arizona). They were in this region from c. 490 AD to the 1300s AD.
Where was the Anasazi tribe located?
The heart of the Anasazi region lay across the southern Colorado Plateau and the upper Rio Grande drainage. It spanned northeastern Arizona, northwestern New Mexico, southeastern Utah and southwestern Colorado—a land of forested mountain ranges, stream-dissected mesas, arid grasslands and occasional river bottoms.
Answer:
Ok 226277226172yeuudyxdujwheudhd
Explanation:
tititifififkfijffkxiockcivjfigkgkgjgkgjcufifufitktktii i i ri ri i rjr jtj jrjr j i i
How did economic changes affect everyday life in the 1930's?
banks closed, people lost their saving and jobs, bread and soup lines were set up to feed the hungry, people lost their homes and farms
Answer:
Necessary and Proper Clause is often called the “Elastic Clause” because it is believed to give Congress “implied powers” that government is assumed to possess without being mentioned in the Constitution. There is a problem with this view: a government that is able to expand its power through an “Elastic Clause” is more likely to abuse its power.
This was a major concern of the Anti-Federalists, who argued that the Necessary and Proper would greatly expand government and leave it up to Congress to decide whether a law was necessary and proper. The Anti-Federalists further argued that the clause left no limitation to federal power and that “ . . . if they may do it, it is pretty certain they will . . . .”
