The standard of living in a Latin American country, such as Brazil, is different from that of the USA, due to the fact that Brazil is an emerging country.
<h3 /><h3>What is the difference between a developed and an emerging country?</h3>
The developing countries have an economy based primarily on agriculture, but with an expressive industrial growth, being able to be suppliers of labor and raw material for developed countries.
Therefore, the standard of living of a developed country like the United States will be higher than that of an emerging country, with greater economic opportunities and a higher quality of life for the population.
Find out more about emerging country here:
brainly.com/question/1518893
#SPJ1
Answer:
North Hemisphere in North America
<span>1. A direct democracy involves democracy in its purest form. All individuals participate at an equal level. This means that all people vote on every single aspect. A drawback of this is when a society becomes too large and it is difficult to keep track of all of the votes or to find a common ground among the people. This can be resolved by having home ballots so that people can mail in their votes.
2. The divine right of kings is the idea that the king was in that position as a direct result of God's will and God's doing.
3. The Holocaust was a mass genocide of Jewish people, LGBTQ, and others. It originated in Germany and was perpetuated by the Nazi party.</span>
Answer: I believe it is Logos
Explanation: Ethos: the source’s credibility, the speaker’s/author’s
authority
Logos: the logic used to support a claim (induction and
deduction); can also be the facts and statistics used to
help support the argument.
Pathos: the emotional or motivational appeals; vivid
language, emotional language and numerous sensory
details
The answer is "agenda setting theory".
Agenda setting portrays an intense impact of the media – the capacity to disclose to us what issues are important.Agenda-setting is the making of open mindfulness and worry of remarkable issues by the news media. This theory appears to be very fitting to enable us to comprehend the unavoidable part of the media (for instance on political correspondence frameworks).