Is there options if not I would say government.
Because when Man walked out of Africa, the Persian Gulf, along with the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers were abundant with fresh ...<span>
</span>
I would say answer B
b. The United States can demonstrate its global leadership
Alexander the III empire ranged from the <span>three continents and covered around two million square miles the entire area from Greece in the west, north to the Danube, south into Egypt and as far to the east as the Indian Punjab.</span>
The assumption that the empire could be ruled and united under the emperor was challenged as many different families and factions fought for control and continuously engaged in warfare and intrigues in order to gain or consolidate power.
Because of the lack of central control and stability, some of the grand projects envisioned by rulers like the Grand Canal or the Great Wall fell by the wayside because of a lack of funding and again the lack of control over the various factions.
This led in some ways to a return to looking inward and working within familial groups and locally controlled provinces. The assumption of a national identity was slowed and even stopped in some places as different provinces again started to look out for their own interests and stood up to fight for them against anyone not willing to allow them that freedom.