Answer:
1. President Theodore Roosevelt’s big stick policy was used by the United States to negotiate an agreement for an American-led canal through Panama, spread American influence in Cuba, and broker a peace treaty between Russia and Japan. Big Stick diplomacy is the policy which refers to a carefully mediated negotiation "speak softly, and carry a big stick." and Roosevelt won the Nobel Peace Prize for it in 1906.
2.
<em>The results of the Big stick policy, Dollar diplomacy, and Moral diplomacy in Latin America made people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions. </em>
<u>President Theodore Roosevelt named its foreign dominant policy, “Big stick policy”. He believed in this policy was the best to apply in Latin America and the Caribbean countries. On the other hand, President William Howard Taft created the Dollar diplomacy. It generated financial aid to support a Latin American region in order to maintain and control the trade and financial interest of the U.S. But people in Latin America did not like the U.S. intervention and many rebellions and uprisings were part of the reactions to these policies. So, The results of the Big stick policy, Dollar diplomacy, and Moral diplomacy in Latin America made people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions. </u>
Answer:
Well it depends. Are you talking about when the Israelites were made slaves for th3e Egyptians? Are you talking about the time period when the Israleites sinned and got punished by beign slaves to different kings?
Explanation:
Mainly it is due to a piece of dirt, and a territorial dispute. India and Pakistan freed themselves from Britain in 1947, and the Indian Independence Act gave Kashmir the opportunity to freely choose which ever country they wanted to accede or join with, whether it be India or Pakistan. The leader of Kashmir chose India, resulting in a two-year war and also resulting in both countries being nuclear armed. It is pure ego and a fight for money and power.
Answer: That the agenda behind it was a communist one
Explanation:
The federal art project of 1935 use to be part of the WPA (world progress administration) during the depression period which was among the New Deal agenda. It was a project meant to provide succor to various artists and support social justice.
However, some congress members lead by Martins Dies Jr. who was the house chair on committee on UN-American activities oppose the federal art project based on the fact that employment into the agency is controlled by communist and that its art works portray that of the communist agenda.
Divides responsibilities to the national government and state governments.