1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irinina [24]
3 years ago
7

While every part of an emergency management program has its own role and function, private citizens are soley responsible for th

e protection of life and property.
a. TRUE
b. FALSE
History
1 answer:
leva [86]3 years ago
3 0
In general, no, it is false that private citizens are solely responsible for the protection of life and <span>property, since the responsibility for this protection often falls on law enforcement groups such as police and private security. </span>
You might be interested in
Briefly explain the meaning and importance of ""the doctrine of chances or averages"" referred to by Wallace.
Trava [24]

"The Doctrine of Chances" is a theory that was proposed by Alfred Russell Wallace that related to the theory of natura selection of Darwinists. This doctrine is what we now consider "statistics." Wallace's idea was to use this doctrine of chances and averages in order to study population genetics.

3 0
3 years ago
Which option below is NOT one of the 5 freedoms of the 1st Amendment in the U.S. Constitution.
tester [92]

The five freedoms of 1st Amendment:

  • Speech.
  • Religion
  • Press
  • Assembly
  • The right to petition the government.

<u>Bear arms is NOT one of them.</u>

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the different types of nationalism?
vampirchik [111]

Answer:

ethnic nationalism, political nationalism, religious nationalism, and or cultural nationalism.

4 0
3 years ago
What was the result of the Supreme Court decision for Dred Scott v. Sanford?
kotykmax [81]

Answer:

It ruled against Dred Scott and set aside the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty.

Explanation:

The case Dred Scott v. Sanford argued whether a slave can obtain his freedom when he step on a state that make slavery illegal.

It happened in 1857. At that time, Dred Scott's (A slave) was taken by his owner from Missouri to Illinois. (According to Missouri compromise,  It is still legal to own slaves in Missouri but It is Illegal to do so in Illinois).

Scott tried to make his case to the court stating that as soon as he entered Illinois, his status as a slave should be voided and he should be considered as a citizen.

At that time, The Missouri supreme court ruled against Scott's plead. The court stated that he could never be a citizen since citizenship only apply to white people. So he's still a slave no matter where his slave owner took him.

7 0
3 years ago
The Supreme Court held that it's not compulsory that all states must license and recognize same-sex marriages,
Alla [95]

Answer:

This is false!

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are some reasons european nations wanted colonies
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of limited government in the Constitution?
    15·1 answer
  • People from which European nation first shipped enslaved Africans to the New World?
    12·1 answer
  • What were the effects after Diocletian split the Roman Empire?
    12·1 answer
  • Match the description with the letter
    12·1 answer
  • The United States achieved independence in the 18th century from what country
    6·2 answers
  • In the 16th and 17th centuries, the heliocentric theory became the centerpiece for debate between
    13·1 answer
  • Which area of the US was mainly agrarian during the 1800's?
    7·2 answers
  • What was the turning point for the British in the war?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the article of confrontation help the thirteen states organize in order to declare independence?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!