The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
<span>
D. Castro started manufacturing hydrogen bombs with the help of communist China.</span>
Answer:
The answer is C. Legislative.
Explanation:
US Congress has two chambers, the House of Representatives and the Senate. They discuss, pass and amend laws, besides doing checks and balances of the actions of the executive branch.
I believe it was the Radio
