The answer to 1 is Savannah
The answer to 2 is lift the ban Georgia had on slavery
The answer to 3 is established policies that influenced Georgia’s government for years
The answer to 4 is He made it possible for the Georgia colony to be established.
The answer to question 5 is produce agriculture to send back to England.
A client has been prescribed lithium. The intervention must be implemented while the client is on lithium therapy is that ''Regularly testing the level of the drug in the client's blood''.
Lithium is used to treat mental health issues like mania (feeling highly excited, overactive or distracted) hypo-mania (akin to mania, but less severe) (similar to mania, but less severe) depression that comes and goes on a regular basis and for which conventional treatments have failed.
To ensure you are taking the proper dosage of lithium and to monitor your blood levels on a regular basis. Doctor will first be examined every week or two weeks. Lithium levels in the blood will be monitored often (generally three times per month), typically 12 hours after the last medication.
To learn more about lithium therapy here
brainly.com/question/28239098
#SPJ4
A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
