Answer:
The aim of both archaeology and history is the research of the human past. The difference between these two disciplines derives from the source materials: historians use written sources while archaeologists concentrate on physical remains. ... Archaeology is challenging results made by the historical research.
Answer: The answer is ether a or c.
Explanation: I say this bc the Reagan Doctrine is anawnsed histery, and there was a Ripple Effect from Reagan's 'Economic War' on the USSR. So in conclusion im not that sure but at least i can tell you that it is one of thous two answers :)
Answer:
A secondary source summarizes large amounts of evidence.
Explanation:
Primary sources correspond to “primary literature” and are those that present themselves and are disseminated exactly as they are produced by their authors. Primary sources are original materials on which other research is based. This type of source presents the information in its original form, without interpretation, summarization or evaluation by other writers.
On the other hand, secondary sources are interpretations and evaluations of primary sources for this reason present a series of evidences that support their interpretations. In this sense, secondary sources may be more useful than a primary source.
I believe it was the Democrats that were strengthened during that time.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The Japanese restricted access until the Perry Expedition and the Meiji Restoration.
