Answer:
I cant see the whole question
Answer:
yes I am Indian and you can see my question I have asked the same
<span> It survived the </span>fragmentation and fall of the Western Roman Empire<span> in the 5th century AD and continued to exist for an additional thousand years until it fell to the </span>Ottoman Turks in 1453. But why did it survive? <span>The eastern half of the Roman Empire was far less vulnerable to external attack, due to its geographic location. With Constantinople located on a strait, it was extremely difficult to breach the capital’s defenses; also, the eastern empire had a much shorter common frontier with Europe. It also benefited greatly from a stronger administrative center and internal political stability, as well as great wealth. The eastern emperors were able to exert more control over the empire’s economic resources and more effectively muster sufficient manpower to combat invasion. </span>
Answer:
Antietam
Explanation:
Union victory at Battle of Antietam (September 1862)
One of his goals was to entice the slave-holding state of Maryland to join the Confederacy, or at least recruit soldiers there.
The statement that describes the distinction between British and French rule in Africa is D. France used direct rule, while Britain used indirect rule.
It should be noted that the main difference between the way the French and the British ruled African countries was that while the French used direct rule, the British used indirect rule.
The indirect rule implies a form of government whereby the governed people have certain legal, administrative, and other powers. While the British still have certain powers over the people they ruled, the French were direct in their approach.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25555071