The line of dialogue which most seems to contribute to reader's understanding of Dave's character is "How could I have asked for a more rewarding evening?"
<h3>What does the line reveal?</h3>
The line of dialogue "How could I have asked for a more rewarding evening?" reveals a few things about Dave's character:
- He will do something he does not enjoy if there is a reward involved.
- He has a sarcastic quality to his personality.
- He is focused on the future.
That is why option 1 seems to be the best answer. Both options 2 and 3 basically review that Dave is methodical. Option 1, however, shows all those traits he has.
Learn more about character here:
brainly.com/question/8864308
#SPJ1
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I know the myth. He can’t hold back from glancing at her andbecause that was the one thing he couldn’t do until they were out of the underworld, she has to go back.
Answer:
Explanation:
n The Portrait of a Lady, Khushwant Singh describes his grandfather from the latter’s portrait that hung above the mantelpiece in the drawing room. His grandfather is seen wearing a big turban and loose-fitting clothes in the portrait. His long, white beard covered the best part of his chest and he looked at least a hundred years old.
Answer:
In the final chapter, Jekyll's letter highlights one of the main themes of the novel, the dual nature of man. It is this concept that caused him to pursue his disastrous experiments that led to his downfall. Hyde, the personification of Jekyll's purely evil characteristics, revels in the freedom of an anonymous existence. Although he successfully distills his evil side, Jekyll still remains a combination of good and evil. Thus, when transforming back and forth, his evil side grows stronger and more powerful after years of repression, and is able to take over completely. In this way, Jekyll's experiments are the opposite of what he hoped. Interestingly, as is repeatedly mentioned throughout the novel, Hyde is a small man often called dwarfish, while Jekyll is a man of large stature. Thus, the reader is left to assume that Jekyll's evil side is much weaker and less developed than his good side. However, appearances can be deceiving. In fact, Hyde's strength far out powers Jekyll's.
In his letter, Jekyll clearly states that he felt no guilt about Hyde's actions, as "Henry Jekyll stood at times aghast before the acts of Edward Hyde, but the situation was apart from ordinary laws, and insidiously relaxed the grasp of conscience. It was Hyde, after all, and Hyde alone, that was guilty." To the reader, this explanation seems ridiculous, because Hyde is in fact part of Jekyll, and a being that Jekyll created. Therefore, clearly Jekyll is responsible for the man's actions.
Explanation:
