Answer:
The correct answer is that eyewitness can be very flaky and untrustworthy.
Explanation:
To the jury, yes their is a eyewitness of this allegedly robbery that my client is being accused of, however how can we be certain that what he says is true. I agree their is nothing that can tell us this person is lying but also there is nothing that is telling they are telling the truth. People sometimes think they saw something when that thing did not occured, it may not be their intentions but the consequences that my client could suffer if you belive in whatever the eyewitness says can be very detremental. As well, for all we know this eyewitness could be the thief and they are saying they saw someone else do it to take the fault out of their way.
So please jury, dont think just because someone says they think they saw somethin that saw the right thing and that they are not lying.
Answer:
Explanation
Explanation:
Many people are very scared that a stronger governent would mean less rights for individuals. States might prefer to decide things like voting laws, drinking/driving ages, or recycling laws by themselves.
Answer:
Roosevelt advocated an active government role.
Explanation:
Different approaches towards the Greta Depression by Hoover and Roosevelt lie in their understanding of the problem. While Hoover looked at the problem as a temporary one which would be fixed automatically, therefore, there was limited involvement but Roosevelt made it the responsibility of the government to take appropriate steps which were reflected in his New Deal Program.
(p⋅10)−(p⋅2)
is the answer hope this helped! :D
Explanation:
Well since yellow journalism isn't a reliable resource, it can lead to misinformation to others. It was known to have caused the Spanish-American War due to lies.
