1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Galina-37 [17]
3 years ago
7

In Korematsu v. United States (1944), the federal exclusion order that forced Japanese Americans into relocation camps was deeme

d constitutional because it was issued under ___________.
A. wartime condition
B. pressure from the general public
C. pressure from the Japanese population
D. an executive order
History
1 answer:
bekas [8.4K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A) wartime conditions

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did Athens and Sparta differ?
cluponka [151]

Answer:

#3 Athens was a democracy whilst Sparta was a monarchy

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What challenges did judaism and christianity bring to the roman empire?
Tju [1.3M]
Christianity became a tool of the Roman Empire fairly early on in it's spread. 
<span>Religion and politics were inseparable in the ancient world, kings usually represented incarnate manifestations of their gods on earth. Polytheistic believers across the ancient Levant were accustomed to their political leaders telling them what gods were to be venerated during their rule and which deity their ruler was representative of in human form. Adding a new deity or giving a new name to an ancient deity whose belief was already established was how the conquering peoples assimilated their conquered. Tanakh recorded that any time such a practice of a Jewish king telling the Jews that they were to worship a foreign deity, the entire Jewish people suffered and did so at the very hands of the people whose deity they had left God to serve. That lesson is told right in our Jewish Bible in several dramatic narratives, the same one the Christians have as an adaptation of their Old Testament, yet they rarely see this in the story because their New Testament does not focus on the contextual meaning of the narrative, but imposes redefined meanings to support it’s dogma, often using topsy-turvy meaning to words and changes translations of phrases in a number of other places. </span>
<span>Early Christian leaders did not want their flock to know the Paschal lamb represented a false man-god of Egypt, so they changed it into a sacrifice for sin to justify human sacrifice (or deicide depending on whether or not they are calling Jesus God in human form). Sin sacrifices are explained in detail in many places, and having nothing to do with the Passover sacrifice. Exodus makes no reference to the use of the Paschal lamb’s blood for expiating sin. Rather, it describes the blood on the door as an act of defiance to false gods and allegiance to the God of Israel. The sacrifice to God showed the Egyptians that the life force (blood) representing their deity was spilled by the Hebrew slaves and their god was powerless over the God of Israel to do a thing about it. It was an act of rejection of the gods of Egypt and alliance to the God of Israel, and that’s in the Torah in Exodus in context. Rather than show that Isaiah was slamming a man for calling himself a man/god representing Venus, Christian dogma personifies and makes a proper name from their Latin translation's word for star and turns that story into something about a fall of angels (no where mentioned in that narrative at ALL) to create giving of the "name" Lucifer for a demon-god of their underworld hell. Every aspect of Jewish belief is given a new spin. Hellenized Jews already apostate to Judaism after four centuries of their occupation and Roman citizens of Judea and the Galilee, desired to entice other Jews to worship as the Greeks that they believed superior in philosophy and knowledge. Jews had laws forbidding these concepts outright so they created texts that tried syncretism, their efforts to claim ,see this is what it was supposed to have been all along. However, the reality remains that those beliefs of incarnate savior deities and human sacrifice are identical to the beliefs and practices that the Torah demonized.Tammuz/Adonis (melded in Roman occupied lands along with and became Mithras worship) were incarnate sacrificed savior deities who had followers of apostate Jews in the North (Galilee) and areas of Paul's travels. Tammuz and the Romanized version of the Zoroastrian Mithras were both born of virgins (a concept having nothing to do with the Davidic Messiah or Tanakh) and their death was said to have brought their people reconciliation to their *sinful natures*. Being born with a burden of sin is a belief of the pagan peoples surrounding Judea and the Gallilee, and contradicts the Torah notion that humans may master evil inclination ( from Genesis) Tammuz was said to die and be reborn each spring. Tammuz worship had become widespread even before the destruction of the First Temple, and had so many apostate Jews as followers, it was condemned in Tanakh in the book of Ezekiel.  hope it helped :)</span>
6 0
3 years ago
2. What types of “direct action” does King refer to in this letter?
Zina [86]

Answer:

Which letter exactly?

Explanation:

Most likely his action to end racism?

8 0
3 years ago
Gnaeus Pompey did not originally wish to join the First Triumvirate. What caused him to change his mind?
poizon [28]

Answer:

  • Land for his soldiers
  • Settlement of a Roman territory.

Explanation:

Pompey had prestige in Rome but he also faced a lot of opposition in the Senate from nobles when he tried to get them to give him land for his soldiers as well as to approve settlement of a Roman territory to the east.

When he saw that he would not manage on his own, he turned to Caesar who already had Crassus on his side. Together they formed the First Triumvirate and Caesar pushed through Pompey's request for land.

5 0
3 years ago
Description of mummification
devlian [24]
Mummificatiom was the process into how a pharaoh was buried for death. They took out his organs and put then into some sort of vases which they then buried with him and his treasures or wealth so he can use them in the "afterlife". They placed him in a sarcophagus all wrapped in a fabric, not sure if it was linen though.

But if you want a more descriptive description then go to Google, those were just in my own words and what I remeber.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The establishment of permanent agricultural communities marked the beginning of what?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the U.S. Navy never authorize the salvage of the USS Arizona?
    8·2 answers
  • When power is concentrated among an elite group, one would say the government is
    13·1 answer
  • The Implications of separation of powers and checks
    12·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer. Johnson’s administration established the Department of Housing and Urban Development in order to assi
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following events produced accusations of a “corrupt bargain” during the election of 1824?
    12·1 answer
  • Which country was the first to go through major industrialization
    10·2 answers
  • Why do historians needs to be careful about being unbiased when presenting historical information
    8·1 answer
  • What part of the United States is found in a humid subtropical climate?
    6·2 answers
  • Under the Covenant Chain, the English agreed to protect Haudenosaunee land claims from white settlers by:
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!