Few people doubted his legitimacy. Legitimacy in this issue isn't characterized by the mainstream vote, vote tallies, our outrage or individuals quibbling about how the procedure turned out badly. It's characterized by a legitimate procedure that — regardless of the possibility that we contend about regardless of whether the Supreme Court settled on the morally remedy choice—was lawful and inside their domain. He promised of office, the Congress and Executive branch perceived that and hence he was the true blue POTUS. Suppositions on this issue are as unessential as sentiments on the presence of gravity.
The chief executive officers of the Roman Republic were the consuls and praetors. Two consuls were chosen annually and they administered the government and led the Roman army into battle.
On 366 BC, a new office was created , that of the praetor. The praetor could govern Rome when the consuls were away from the city and could also lead armies. The praetor's primary function however was the execution of justice. He was in charge of the civil law as it applied to Roman citizens.
Answer: Hi here what I think.
Churchill war of speech was really inspirational. To understand Britain was in a very difficult time. Churchill refused to surrender Britain to the Nazi that inspired the country. His speech gave people hope that they could win when they were losing very badly.
I hope this helps:)
Napoleon was a great leader because he was shrewd ambitious risk taker and an exceptional military strategist Napoleon conquer a substantial proportion of Europe in the early 19th century and he served as the emperor of France twice in 1799policies politic power in France in a coup d’etat
