1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
snow_tiger [21]
4 years ago
6

Many Americans were reluctant to get involved in World War I. They favored a policy of isolationism, meaning that they preferred

that the U.S. government stay out of world affairs. The opposite view, internationalism, supported the U.S. taking an active role in world affairs. Even after American involvement in World War I, many Americans wanted to maintain a policy of isolationism. Do you think that a policy of isolationism is appropriate in our modern world? Do you think that is possible in our world today? Explain.
History
1 answer:
Naddik [55]4 years ago
5 0
<span>#1) Do you think that a policy of isolationism is appropriate in our modern world?<span>
</span><span>
Answer: I truly believe that a policy of isolationism is not appropriate in our modern world. Given that now almost everything is more about interconnection than ever before.</span>

#2) Do you think that is possible in our world today? Explain.

Answer: It is not possible in our world today because almost every state is involved in international trade, globalization, and world wide communication. Isolationism is impossible given that this internationals structures that have been built over time could come down and it would not benefit anyone.<span>
</span>
I hope it helps, Regards.<span>
</span></span>
You might be interested in
Match the following items. 1. Allied attack beginning takeover of France Bay of Pigs 2. Japanese bombing attack on the United St
ruslelena [56]

Allied attack beginning takeover of France. Normandy

Japanese bombing attack on US Navy. Pearl Harbor.

Atomic bomb site at end of war on Pacific front. Nagasaki

An orginization for solving world problems peacefully. United Nations

Organization giving European nations defence against communism. Nato

Organization giving Asian nations defence against communism. SEATO 3

Resolution giving Johnson authority to retaliate militarily in Vietnam. Gulf of Tonkin Resolution

Bloodless conflict between the US and Soviet Union. Cold war

Financial aid to European nations. Marshal Plan.

Cuban invasion that attempted to overthrow Castro. Bay of Pigs

Determined the future of occupied nations following WWII. Potsdam

Withdrawal of US troops from Vietnam. Vietnamization.

4 0
4 years ago
when civilzations first moved from hunting-and-gathering subsistence to agricultured subsistence, people were able to cultivate
posledela
Three aspects would technology, goverment and cultural diffusion hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between India's government and Vietnam's government?
nekit [7.7K]
In India they have a federal republic government while India had a communist state gov. In India they have the supreme court for their judicial branch while Vietnam has the supreme people’s court for the judicial branch
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was the leader of incas in 1532? a chief joseph b sitting bull c montezuma d atahualpha
NeX [460]
A. Chief Joseph was the leader of incas in 1532

4 0
4 years ago
HELPPP RNNNN ASAPPPPPP
alexandr1967 [171]

The answers to the questions are given below:

<h3>How did Nehru’s introduction frame the theme for the rest of the speech?</h3>

The theme was a A tryst with destiny and it was one  whose introduction  was an embodiment of India's wake-ness to life and freedom.

<h3>What references are made to responsibility and concepts of citizenship?</h3>

The references made to responsibility and concepts of citizenship is that citizenship is linked to the act of promoting national unity, and it is one that is done in universal and secular way and not self-reliance.

<h3>Who is PM Nehru addressing, most broadly?</h3>

The speech  was addressing the works of the colonial masters, life and freedom of the India nation.

<h3>What does Nehru specifically talk about ending (for the betterment of India)?</h3>

It is the ending in regards to poverty, ignorance, disease and inequality of opportunity that has consumed the India nation.

<h3>What is the conclude toon of the speech?</h3>

In the ending of the speech of the  tryst with destiny, it was an hopeful tone.

<h3>How does this speech tie into the broader global picture of decolonization and independence from imperial powers?</h3>

This speech was one that tells more about the evil works of colonial masters and its effect on the nations that have  taken advantage of. The speech is one that believes that one day there will be more to life and there will be total freedom and independence of India from their colonial masters.

Learn more about  PM Nehru from

brainly.com/question/1227101

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who called the Wannsee Conference into session?
    14·1 answer
  • Which describes a way that racism became a legacy of imperialism?
    6·1 answer
  • How did England become the dominant power in north America.
    15·2 answers
  • Who's president of the united stated
    15·1 answer
  • What attracted European migrants to the middle colonies?
    9·1 answer
  • What did Socrates,Plato,and Aristotle think of democracy?
    6·1 answer
  • How were Dutch colonization efforts different from those of other imperial nations? A. They wanted to spread Catholicism. B. The
    10·2 answers
  • When President Washington took office which was NOT a problem he had to address?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the difference between a civic duty and a civic responsibility? Be sure to give an example for each to help explain.
    15·1 answer
  • Why did franklin roosevelt launch new deal programs during his first hundred days in office?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!