Answer:
a. 56%
b. 62%
Explanation:
a. Janitorial costs are allocated based on square feet.
Assembly Department Square feet = 42,560
Total area for both departments = 42,560 + 33,440 = $76,000
Percentage of costs
= 42,560/ 76,000
= 56%
b. Security costs are allocated based on asset value.
Cutting Department Asset Value = $126,480
Total asset value for both departments = 77,520 + 126,480 = $204,000
Percentage of costs
= 126,480/ 204,000
= 62%
Restaurants of any size are regulated by a variety of local, state and federal laws dealing with health and safety for customers and employees. A critical component of restaurant design is providing restrooms for customers and employees, and for both men and women in each category. This includes the physical facilities and signage, as well as provision for handicapped or wheelchair access. In most areas, a local health department is the key agency monitoring all regulations related to restaurant restrooms, and it should be consulted during the design phase. An inspection, including restrooms, normally is required before a restaurant can open.
Answer:
B. Mary will win the case as she had already won at the U.S. Court of Appeals.
Explanation:
When 8 judges review Mary's case and is split 4-4 she will win the case as she has won it in the lower court. However the case will not set a precedent for future cases.
This is a rare occurrence as there are usually 9 justices presiding in supreme court reviews.
Answer:
Pair 4
Explanation:
Has the lowest marginal cost
Answer:
Hierarchy of hazard control is a system used in industry to minimize or eliminate exposure to hazards. It is a widely accepted system promoted by numerous safety organizations. This concept is taught to managers in industry, to be promoted as standard practice in the workplace.
Explanation:
five rungs of the Hierarchy of Controls: elimination, substitution, engineering controls, administrative controls and personal protective equipment. The hierarchy is arranged beginning with the most effective controls and proceeds to the least effective.
