I believe it is a claim because it does focus on the main idea and what the text/passage should be about. If not I deeply apologize.
Answer:
International trade would grind to a halt
Explanation:
Sorry if this didn't make sense to you.
Answer: price of a large van = $35000
price of a small van = $30000
Explanation:
Let the price of a large van = x
Let the price of a small van = y
Since A receives 5 large vans and 2 small vans for a total cost of $235,000. Location B receives 2 large vans and 3
small vans for a total cost of $160,000. This can be written as:
5x + 2y = 235000 ........ i
2x + 3y = 160000 ........ ii
Multiply equation i by 2
Multiply equation ii by 5
10x + 4y = 470000 ..... iii
10x + 15y = 800000 ..... iv
Subtract iii from iv
11y = 330,000
y = 330000/11.
y = 30,000
From equation I,
5x + 2y = 235000
5x + 2(30000) = 235000
5x + 60000 = 235000
5x = 235000 - 60000
5x = 175000
x = 175000 / 5
x = 35000
Therefore, price of a large van = 35000
price of a small van = 30000
Answer:
OA. A parent is usually wiser than a child, and logic is not always the best way to solve a problem.
Explanation:
In the given passage, the problem of who gets the last apple or how to equally distribute the fruit so as not to anger anyone in the central conflict. While Tim insisted that he deserves it as Karen already had the last orange, Karen believes she should have the last apple considering she's hungrier than Tim.
With the mother's intervention, there is a probable solution to that dilemma. Thus, not only did the mother gave a solution for the problem, but she also brings out the theme of how adults, parents are usually wiser than children and that applying logic is not always a sure way of solving a problem.
Thus, the correct answer is option A.
To read minds so I can see what peoples true thoughts are
