Answer:
Dialogue as a Tool for Characterization. In all forms of writing, dialogue can help writers flesh out their characters to make them more lifelike, and give readers a stronger sense of who each character is and where they come from.
Explanatio Dialogue is a wonderful way to show characterization, and also the relationships between your characters. Not only what people say, but the way they say it, gives the reader quality information about your character.n:
Answer: d.
Explanation: In this excerpt from the introductory note of "The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin", a key detail about Franklin's employment in the excerpt is <u><em>Benjamin Franklin worked at the "New England Courant." </em></u>This was one of the first American newspapers. It was founded by James Franklin, Benjamin's brother. Benjamin did many jobs there. He also wrote articles. The newspaper was a success.
The right to bear arms give citizens the means to protect the rights given to them in the first amendment (freedom of religion, speech, press, etc.) .
McCarthyism is nothing more than a witch hunt. A lot of finger pointing and not a lot of proof. Both parties (Democrat & Republican) in the United States use this in todays world. Ill give examples of both and follow up with how it can be beneficial to each party.
Democrats: Accuse other politicians of being "racist" or "bigoted" just from political ideas and from certain members of the base. While it is not fact or true that Republicans are by policy racist, it is a word that is hated by people and has a negative connotation to it, forcing some to keep distance from said person
Republicans: Accuse other politicians of being "muslin lovers" or "muslins" themselves. We saw this for the entire Obama presidency. Congress and some Republican supporters would use the word "muslin" to describe the president in order to give a negative connotation towards Obama. This has some strong effectiveness due to the recent events (September 11th, 2001).
Both parties are trying to stick a negative idea/precedent/description about the opposition in order to sway votes. This tactic is very effective because not only will you sway votes, theres little repercussion in doing so because the people who disagree with you are not going to be swayed, but that voter in the middle who cares about one issue over the other (in this case racism over fear of muslims or vice versa fear of muslims over racism).
Either someone is intelligent enough to know the rhetoric between the two parties and votes by policy (unaffected / no positive or negative response), they don't care about either issue (unaffected / no positive or negative response), or someone is strongly in favor of one or the other (strong positive or negative response).
While there are some attempts that have been made and can be made that would be so egregious that most people have a negative response, but that rarely happens and would be deemed political suicide.
Hope this helps.
Answer: shift
Explanation:
Based on the information given, the rhetorical technique used is shift. It should be noted that a rhetorical shift occurs when the tone or the style of a speakers or a writer is being altered. A rhetorical shift is a can be signalled when transition words such as however, then, or but are used.
