Answer:
The company’s profit margin for the current year ended December 31 (rounded to the nearest decimal point) is 20%
Explanation:
Use the following formula to calculate the Profit Margin
Profit Margin = 
Where
Net Income = $20,000
Net Sales = $100,000
Placing values in the formula
Profit Margin = 
Profit Margin = 0.2 x 100
Profit Margin = 20%
Answer:
The answer is 30%
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
Project A
Project A costs = $350
Cash flows =$250 and $250 (next 2 years)
Project B
Project B costs =$300
Cash flow = $300 and $100
Now what is the crossover rate for these projects.
Thus
Year Project A Project B A-B B-A
0 -350 -300 -50 50
1 250 300 -50 50
2 250 100 150 -150
IRR 27% 26% 30% 30%
So,
CF = CF1/(1+r)^1 + CF2/(1+r)^2
$-50 = $-50/(1+r)^1 + $150/(1+r)^2
r = 30%
CF = CF1/(1+r)^1 + CF2/(1+r)^2
$50 = $50/(1+r)^1 + $-150/(1+r)^2
r = 30%
Hence, the cross over rate for these project is 30%
Note:
IRR =Internal rate of return
CF =Cash flow
r = rate
Answer:
CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects
Explanation:
International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans are prepared by the Council for International
Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) . The ethical justification for undertaking health-related research involving humans is its scientific and social value: the prospect of generating the knowledge and the means necessary to protect and promote people’s health. Patients, health professionals, researchers, policy-makers, public health officials, pharmaceutical companies and others rely on the results of research for activities and decisions that impact individual and public health, welfare, and the use of limited resources. Therefore, researchers, sponsors, research ethics committees, and health authorities, must ensure that proposed studies are scientifically sound, build on an adequate prior knowledge base, and are likely to generate valuable information.
Answer:
b. 6 pairs of jeans per crate of olives; and
c. 4 pairs of jeans per crate of olives
Explanation:
Olives Jeans Trade off Ratio (Olives:Jeans)
Spain 1 3 1:3 or 0.33:1 (1/3 = 0.33)
Denmark 1 11 1:11 or 0.09:1 (1/11= 0.09)
Spain & Denmark have less opportunity cost & hence comparative advantage than each other, in Olive & Jeans respectively.
Spain will export Olives to Denmark (importer). Denmark will export Jeans to Spain (Importer). Trade will be gainful if they get exchange ratio better than domestic exchange ratio.
- '2 jeans pairs per olive crate' not gainful trade ratio for Spain, as it is getting more i.e 3 jeans pair per olive crate at its own domestic ratio.
- '13 jeans per olive' not gainful for Denmark, as 0.07 = (1/13) olive per jeans is worse than its own domestic ratio i.e 0.09 = (1/11) olive per jeans
'4 jeans pairs per olive crate' is gaining trade ratio for:
- Spain: As it gets 4 i.e more than 3 pairs of jeans per olive crate
- Denmark : As it gets 0.25 = (1/4) i.e more than 0.09 olive crates per pair of jeans
'6 jeans pairs per olive crate' is gaining trade ratio for:
- Spain: As it gets 6 i.e more than 3 pairs of jeans per olive crate
- Denmark : As it gets 0.16 = (1/6) i.e more than 0.09 olive crates per pair of jeans
Both of them are gainful trade ratios, but:
- 1olive:4 jeans is more gainful for Denmark, as it is gaining relatively more than domestic exchange rate (0.25 is more > 0.09 than 4 > 3).
- 1olive:6jeans is more gainful for Spain as it is gaining relatively more than domestic exchange rate (6 is more > 3 than 0.16 > 0.09)
