1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mekhanik [1.2K]
3 years ago
13

Why did Athens trade with others? What did they import?

History
1 answer:
Elina [12.6K]3 years ago
5 0
Trade was a fundamental aspect of the ancient Greek world and following territorial expansion, an increase in population movements, and innovations in transport, goods could be brought, sold, and exchanged in one part of the Mediterranean which had their origin in a completely different and far distant region.  <span />
You might be interested in
What did the Balfour Declaration proclaim?
tangare [24]
The balfour declaration proclaim : C. British support the creation of a jewish state in Palestine

The balfour declaration was created in november 1917, which content basically showed that the British Favoured a Jewish homeland in Palestine and therefore support the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine

6 0
3 years ago
The 18th and 19th century Industrial Revolution included all of the following EXCEPT _____.
STALIN [3.7K]
What are the choices to chose from
4 0
3 years ago
What conditions in Northern Europe encouraged emigration to the U.S. in the 1800’s?
g100num [7]

Answer:

Cotton became the South's most important crop. Describes the difference between an agrarian and an industrialist in the 1800s? One favors policies that support farming and the other favors policies that support factories. ... The geography of the South supported the growing of cash crops in what ways.

Explanation:

i cant see the pic so i went for the best guess

edit: d i se it now

8 0
2 years ago
How do the Himalayan Mountains affect trade?
MAXImum [283]

Answer:

The mountains impede trade because they are too high and vast to easily transport

4 0
3 years ago
The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as ________.
nevsk [136]

Answer:

The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as an illustration of the widespread hatred of Indians during the Age of Jackson.

Explanation:

When Jackson rose to power the situation with the American Indians was extremely tense. Just a few years before, in 1815, the country began to expand towards the west and ran into the tribes of American Indians who had inhabited the country for centuries. Those occupied lands aroused the desires of the colonies, which initiated a series of campaigns to get the Natives to travel further west in exchange for all economic royalties.

In fact, already during Jefferson's tenure (in office between 1801 and 1809) it had been established that the only natives who could stay east of the Mississippi would be those who had "civilized" and could coexist with the "white man." Based on this, those that had remained in the region were the Chicksaw, Choctaw, Creek, Seminole and Cherokee tribes. These, in exchange for maintaining their territories, had fixed their settlements, tilled the land, divided their land into private property and had adopted democracy. Some became Christian (at least in appearance) so as not to be expelled from the area.

In 1830, just one year after taking power, Jackson decided to solve the Indian problem by the brave. That is, creating a law to deport them further west. That year, the Indian Removal Act was passed, which obliged the Indians to move to lands west of the Mississippi and authorized the president of the United States to act against all those located to the east of the Mississippi river.

Officially, the politician made this decision because of the need for land to produce cotton and for "national security" (to avoid conflicts between Indians and Americans). However, in addition to these two causes and his own racism, Jackson also sought to create a human barrier between the United States and the regions under the control of other transatlantic powers. With them, Jackson not only sought to empty the Indian territories colonized west of the Mississippi Indian conflicts, but also create a security belt to the Spanish and British threat that was still installed in large North American territories.

Regardless of the cause, in practice, tens of thousands of Indians were urged to leave the houses in which they lived (their lands for centuries) to leave for "reserved" territories.

At the official level, Jackson claimed that the natives had the possibility of refusing this "relocation" and keeping their home in the United States. However, the reality was that the government (at the head of which was the president) exerted a brutal pressure on the tribal chiefs to leave. In addition, they made it clear that, in the face of the refusal, they would use force.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can someone tell me about the Constitutional Leaders?
    5·1 answer
  • An amendment to the Constitution is alan
    8·1 answer
  • 1. How did Abigail Adams manage her household economy during wartime?
    14·1 answer
  • What pull factors brought people to the west? Explain
    9·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt from Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s “Pearl Hatbor Address yo the Nation”
    13·1 answer
  • After Soviet postwar actions made it plain that it was trying to expand communist influence, President Harry Truman and his advi
    9·1 answer
  • Why was the warren commission created in november 1963?
    15·2 answers
  • Kind of England during the American war of Independance
    11·1 answer
  • HELP!!
    9·1 answer
  • "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!