C that we can get Texas now
The presidential system selects a head of government independently of the legislature, while in contrast, the head of government in a parliamentary system answers directly to the legislature. Presidential systems necessarily operate under the regulations of separation of powers, while parliamentary methods do not.
<h3>What is the presidential state of government give an example?</h3>
A presidential system is a method of government where a head of government is also head of state and shows an executive branch that is different from the legislative branch. The United States, for instance, has a presidential system.
<h3>What is the difference of parliamentary and presidential?</h3>
In a parliamentary form of government, the powers are divided between the little head and the real head of the state. In a presidential form of government on the other hand the forces are concentrated in the hands of the single executive or the President of the nation.
To learn more about presidential system, refer
brainly.com/question/15453662
#SPJ9
Answer pick one.The Mexican government refused to recognize Texas’s independence, so the two nations were still at war. Houston also needed to persuade other nations to recogonize Texas as being independent. The new president faced financial prob- lems as well. The government had debts from the Texas Revolution and no money with which to repay them. Native Texans, who had remained peaceful during the Revolution, resented the growing number of settlers invading their territory. Now they threatened to declare war.
Explanation:
The Atlantic Charter-the joint declaration of the president of the United States of Roosevelt and the Prime Minister of Great Britain Churchill of August 14, 1941, signed on board the English battleship Prince of Wales "in the Bay of Argentia (O. Newfoundland).
The declaration proclaimed in it the sovereignty, territorial inviolability, security and economic cooperation of the countries, striving to achieve for all people "a higher standard of living, economic development and social Security and disarmament of aggressive countries.
