1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
HACTEHA [7]
3 years ago
12

In a mixed-market economy, the government regulates business

History
2 answers:
Agata [3.3K]3 years ago
8 0
Yes that would be true that in a mixed market economy the government gets to regulate business only when necessary <span />
expeople1 [14]3 years ago
8 0

Only when necessary is the right answer.

A mixed economy system is a system in which the elements of capitalism and socialism are observed. This system protects private investments and provides a level of economic freedom in the use of resources, but in order to achieve its social goal,ls it also allows the government to interfere in economic activities.  

The government regulates business, for several reasons such as for public safety and welfare, protection of industry, and also for revenue generation. However, government can only interfere in the economic activities only when it became a necessity.  


You might be interested in
Why does education play such a vital role in understanding freedoms?
mojhsa [17]
If the education a specific individual is given is poor, then they won't understand their freedoms. (For example, some slaves were kept even after the Civil War because they were lied to and told they weren't free.)

I hope this answer helped you! If you have any further questions or concerns, feel free to ask! :)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What if Lincoln would allowed South Carolina to take fort summer in 1861
finlep [7]

Answer:

04/12/2011

On this date, a century and a half ago, Confederate forces fired on Fort Sumter, on an island off the coast of South Carolina. The Confederate States of America asserted not only their right to secede but also to claim federal property within their borders. The newly inaugurated U.S. president, Abraham Lincoln, rejected both claims and refused to evacuate Sumter.

“Plainly, the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy,” Lincoln had said in his somber inaugural address a month earlier. “A majority, held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people. Whoever rejects it does of necessity fly to anarchy or despotism. Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left.”

The Civil War, to Lincoln, was never technically a “war” but an illegal and unconstitutional rebellion and a fight to put down the rebellion. The details of the events leading to the firing on Fort Sumter have much to do with this attitude and with his total rejection of the possibility of secession.

By attempting to resupply Sumter, Lincoln succeeded in forcing the Confederacy to fire the first shots. Lincoln had to accept the loss of Sumter soon after. But he was successful, so to speak, in forcing the other side to start the shooting. Lincoln believed that justified the military actions that he subsequently ordered to put down the rebellion.

5 0
3 years ago
What impact did the Concert of Europe have on Europe?
iVinArrow [24]

The Concert of Europe was the European diplomatic and political order that emerged after the fall of Napoleon in 1815. After decades of war and political upheaval, Europe's major powers convened and charted a new course for Europe.

4 0
3 years ago
What contributed to the decision by US leaders to pass the Pacific Railway Act of 1862?
Lelu [443]
Your answer should be ‘the rapid settlement of the American West’, since according to senate.gov, it reads ‘ | The rapid settlement of the western territories | in the 1850s convinced most members of Congress of the need for efficient rail transport to the Pacific coast,’.
3 0
2 years ago
why was a husband's character so important in determining a woman's life in the early nineteenth century
nydimaria [60]
I know it’s probably to late to help you, but anyone else who looks up the question could then get the answer. And the answer is “Women had a few legal rights of their own”
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What were 2 ways that the industrial revolution caused Europeans to look for new colonies
    8·1 answer
  • What ideas did Isaac Newton contribute to the Scientific Revolution?
    7·2 answers
  • Sectional differences in the United States during the early 1800s were mostly rooted in differences about
    13·1 answer
  • What was the goal of the abolition movement?
    8·2 answers
  • What role did the rule of law serve in the early united states ?
    10·1 answer
  • Economics definition
    10·2 answers
  • What themes were common in English architecture?
    14·2 answers
  • Which event marks an escalation of antisemitism from discrimination to violence in Nazi Germany?
    10·1 answer
  • Why was sailing better than traveling on land trade routes during the renaissance?
    11·1 answer
  • Why was Wiesel shocked by the actions of Franklin Delano
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!