Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
Answer:
Explanation:
A product item is a specific version of a product that can be designated as a distinct offering among an organization's products. A product line is a group of closely related products offered by an organization.
Answer:
pay a wage rate less than labor's MRP
Explanation:
A monopsonistic employer in an unorganized (nonunion) labor market will: "pay a wage rate less than labor's MRP"
The above statement is based on the idea that Monopsony is a market situation whereby a single buyer or firm is the only purchaser of a good or service, which in most cases has to do with the purchase of labor.
And given the fact that the firm is the sole purchaser of labor, where there is no labor union, there is a high tendency that such firm or employer pays a wage rate less than labor's marginal revenue productivity.
Answer:
Cost per customer acquired = $51.67
Explanation:
Customer acquired per thousand pieces mailed = 1000*6% = 60
Total cost per thousand pieces mailed A $3,100
Divide by Customers acquired B <u> 60 </u>
Cost per customer acquired A/B <u> $51.67</u>
