Answer:
B. A dilation with a scale factor of 0.5
Step-by-step explanation:
A. is wrong because it is congruent transformation because reflections keep the angles and side lengths of the figure the same.
B. is right because it is NOT congruent because a dilation of any scale factor other than 1 results in a similar figure, because the side lengths are proprtional but not equivalent
C. is wrong because translations keep the angles and side lengths of the figure the same.
D. is wrong because a scale factor of 1 changes nothing about the figure.
the first one is 0.00001
Step-by-step explanation:
its on the screen
Answer: 27 dogs were seen at the clinic on monday.
27/45 = 0.6
0.6 = 60%
To make the inequality, we will use the ≥ sign to determine how many more tickets we will need. Before we write the inequality, let's see how much money was already made by the present tickets. 70 x 9.50 = $665.
We can write the inequality as $665 + $9.50t ≥ $1000 where t is the number of tickets sold. Now we can solve
$665 + $9.50t ≥ $1000, subtract 665
$9.50t ≥ $335. Now isolate the t by divide 9.50 to both sides
t ≥ 35.26 which we can round up to 36 because you cant sell 35.26 tickets.
So you need at least 36 more tickets to earn at least $1000
False ?
I am not sure, I took the test and I don’t remember the answer
